Legal
Barclays Sidesteps Fraud Case, But Charges Against Kalaris Still Stand
A UK court has discarded the charges filed against the UK lender, but charges against four of its former directors remain live.
A court has dismissed charges brought against UK lender Barclays last year over how
it raised more than $15 billion at the peak of the financial
crisis, saving it from a bailout.
The bank had faced two charges of conspiring to commit fraud in
relation to a Qatar-led fundraiser in 2008, which allowed it to
sidestep a state bailout, unlike rivals Royal Bank of Scotland
(RBS) and Lloyds.
However, charges for conspiracy to commit fraud against four
former directors – including industry luminary Tom Kalaris, who
headed up Barclays’ wealth management unit at the time – still
stand.
The ruling is a set-back for the Serious Fraud Office (SFO),
which has spent half a decade investigating the case and was once
on the brink of being wound down. The suit against Barclays was
set to be a test of merit for the unit, and it is understood it
will seek to overturn the court’s decision and re-instate the
charges.
An SFO spokesman said: “We are considering our position in
respect of today’s ruling concerning the companies.”
Alongside Kalaris still facing charges are former chief executive
John Varley; Roger Jenkins, an ex-senior investment banker; and
Richard Boath, former European head of financial
institutions.
Barclays said in a statement: “The dismissals do not and should
not be taken to indicate any finding on the issue of whether a
criminal offence has or may have been committed by other
persons.”
In June last year, when the SFO initially filed the charges, the
case was propelled up the press’ agenda because it marked the
beginning of a trial that could have led to unprecedented
convictions against banking executives for their actions during
the financial tsunami.
To read an in-depth analysis of the case written by your
correspondent following an interview with a former SFO employee,
click here.