Tax
GUEST ARTICLE: Changes To UK's Enterprise Investment Schemes, Venture Capital Trusts - A Guide
.jpg)
There have been rule changes to how EIS and VCT structures work. This article explains the new market.
Enterprise Investment Schemes and Venture Capital Trusts are ways in which people can secure considerable tax breaks by putting money to work in start-ups, early-stage and specialist companies in the UK. It may come as a surprise to realise that they have been around for more than 20 years and have survived – despite the odd worry – Conservative, Conservative/Liberal Democrat and Labour administrations. Politicians like to boast (not always very convincingly) of their support for small business, but the reality is that as other forms of tax incentives have been eroded in some ways (such as for lifetime pension saving tax-free limits), structures such as the EIS have drawn new followers. This article is by John Glencross, chief executive of Calculus). He talks about recent rule changes, how they affect investors, and future points to consider. The editors of this publication are grateful to Calculus Capital for sharing these insights. As ever, they do not necessarily share all the opinions expressed and invite readers to react.
  The Finance Act that came into law last November brought with it
  changes to the rules governing EIS and VCT vehicles. These
  changes relate mainly to the criteria used to determine
  companies’ funding eligibility and the levels of investment they
  can receive. They are ultimately designed to ensure that capital
  is targeted at the entrepreneurial growth businesses that need it
  most. 
  
  While we don’t believe the new regime should materially affect
  the attractiveness of EIS and VCT structures to
  suitable investors, they do add greater complexity to the VCT and
  EIS rulebooks, which is something investment managers must deal
  with. 
  
  In broad terms, the key changes mean that companies older than
  seven years will no longer will be able to receive EIS or VCT
  funding, nor will companies with more than 250 employees, and no
  single company will be able to receive more than £12 million in
  investment. 
  
  Knowledge intensive company rules
  But there are exceptions. So-called “knowledge intensive
  companies”, which generally refers to businesses with high
  research and developments costs and highly skilled employees, are
  subject to slightly different rules. They have a ten year “age
  limit”, £20 million funding cap and limit of 500 employees. The
  seven and ten year age limits do not apply where the company has
  received EIS or VCT funding in its first seven years, nor where
  the EIS or VCT investment is more than 50 per cent of the average
  turnover of the investee company over the past five years -
  provided the new funds are used for new geographies or new
  products.
  
  VCT capacity may be constrained in 2016
  A further and significant change that will have an immediate
  impact on VCTs is the prohibition on using VCT funding to finance
  management buyouts or buy-ins. Many VCTs do this and some are not
  raising new funds this tax year as a result of this new
  restriction affecting their investment strategy.
  
  As far as other amendments to the rulebook go, there is a ban on
  so called “trade and asset” acquisitions from VCT or EIS funding.
  A consequence of this is that it extends to companies using VCT
  or EIS money to acquire intangible assets such as patents from
  other companies. Speaking as growth capital investors, this is an
  exceptionally short-sighted decision by the Treasury. The OECD
  has pointed out that modern companies spend more on acquiring
  intellectual property than they do on fixed plant and machinery.
  A life sciences company, for example, may need to acquire rights
  to use a patent held by someone else to enable them to achieve
  some step in their own core research more easily. Making it more
  difficult for a small company to acquire rights to relevant IPR
  suggests a Conservative government that doesn’t understand the
  needs of modern businesses. 
  
  More positively, the Treasury has accepted that replacement
  capital - where funding is used to buy shares from existing
  shareholders - should be allowed within the VCT and EIS
  regulations. It is recognised that it is often necessary to sort
  out shareholding structures in SMEs prior to a venture capital
  investment. The details are to be confirmed but it is likely that
  up to 50 per cent of any investment up to £5 million ($7.25
  million), i.e. £2.5 million, will be allowed in the form of
  replacement capital in any rolling 12-month period. Replacement
  capital was not allowed under the original scheme regulations but
  the industry took up the issue with the Treasury, pointing out
  that the Global Block Exemption Regulations - the overarching EU
  guidelines governing tax advantaged venture capital schemes in
  the EU - allow for replacement capital. The Treasury is therefore
  in discussion with the EU about allowing it for VCTs and EIS
  investment. The detail is yet to be settled and approval is
  likely to be sometime in 2016.
   
  Fundamental attractions
  Some people have contended the new rules could make EIS and
  VCT investments less attractive to some investors; viz, it
  could be argued that because the changes will make it more
  difficult for established or larger companies to obtain VCT or
  EIS funding, investment will instead be focused on smaller or
  earlier stage companies and so investment risks will
  increase. 
  
  This may be true to some extent but it should not be forgotten
  that the fundamental purpose of VCT and EIS
  investment is to provide smaller and fledgling companies
  with funding to help them achieve their growth potential.
  Discounting for a moment the fact that even under the new rules,
  EIS and VCT-qualifying businesses may already be well-established
  and profitable, such companies have always carried with them a
  higher degree of risk than later stage or listed companies. That
  is why EIS and VCT investments come with such generous
  tax reliefs. Both provide initial tax relief of 30 per cent,
  while VCTs pay tax-free dividend payments, a highly valuable
  feature for those requiring income and profits that are free of
  capital gains tax, the latter also being true of EIS
  investments. 
  
  EIS investments are, additionally, free of inheritance tax after
  two years, provide loss relief so that the maximum loss on a
  single investment is 38.5 pence in the pound for a taxpayer
  paying the top income tax rate of 45 per cent, and allow for CGT
  deferral.
  
  In totality, these tax reliefs provide considerable protection
  against possible losses, particularly for EIS investments.
  Coupled with the growth potential of smaller companies, we
  believe VCT and EIS vehicles will continue to appeal to
  investors.
  
  And the attractiveness of EISs and VCTs to wealthy investors is
  enhanced when considered in the context of tax reliefs being
  heavily reduced on pensions. The annual pension contribution
  limit is £40,000 today, when only a few years ago it was
  £255,000, and the lifetime limit for tax relieved pension
  contributions is shortly to fall to £1 million. Additionally, the
  annual allowance for anyone earning more than £150,000 a year
  will from April be tapered to a minimum of £10,000. In light of
  these circumstances, EIS and VCT vehicles are being
  used more and more in retirement planning strategies.
  
  Factor in today’s environment of low yields and hard-to-come-by
  capital growth from mainstream investments and the high growth
  potential of VCTs and EISs may make them more attractive to some
  investors than they have ever been.  
  
  Summary
  Overall, our view is that there is now more complexity to the VCT
  and EIS rules, which is unhelpful for investment managers, though
  the appeal of EISs and VCTs to investors is fundamentally
  undiminished. 
Because some VCT managers will need to reconsider their investment strategies in light of the management buy-out/buy-in restriction, we are likely to see reduced capacity in the VCT sector in the short-term. This is something that investors and wealth managers will need to bear in mind if they are thinking about making VCT investments this tax year.
  The key EIS and VCT rule changes:
  - The purpose of the investment must be to promote business
  growth and development; 
  - All investors must be “independent” from the company at
  the time of the first share issue; 
  - The EIS annual limit of £5 million is now to include
  investments in subsidiaries or where trades are transferred
  in; 
  - There is a new limit of £12 million on the total lifetime
  investment a company may receive through EIS or VCT, with some
  exceptions including “knowledge-intensive” companies; 
  - There is a new age limit of seven years from the first
  relevant commercial sale, with some exceptions including
  “knowledge-intensive” companies or companies that have already
  raised EIS or VCT funding; 
  - EIS and VCT funds may not be used for the acquisition of
  existing companies; 
  - With regards to “knowledge-intensive” companies, the
  lifetime investment limit is £20 million instead of £12 million
  and the age limit is ten years from the first commercial sale;
   
  - Age limits will not apply where the investment represents
  more than 50 per cent of turnover averaged over the preceding
  five years; 
  - The number of employees allowed in “knowledge-intensive”
  companies is being raised from 250 to 500.
  VCT tax reliefs:
  - 30 per cent income tax relief up to a maximum investment
  of £200,000 per year. Shares must be held for five years or tax
  relief will be claimed back. Tax relief is paid in the form of a
  rebate and is only available on tax an individual has
  paid; 
  - Tax-free dividends, and
  - Free of capital gains tax.
  EIS tax reliefs:
  - 30 per cent income tax relief; 
  - Free of capital gains tax; 
  - Loss relief; 
  - 100 per cent inheritance tax relief, and 
  - CGT deferral. 
This article reflects Calculus Capital’s understanding of current (February 2016) UK legislation and practice. Bases and rates of taxation are liable to future change.