"Greenwashing" Controversies Focus Minds On What Investors Own

Tom Burroughes Group Editor 16 November 2023

This news service talks to the MFO – born from a series of corporate mergers and acquisitions – about how controversies in areas of ESG investing and sustainability are ultimately positive in the long run if they underscore the need for deep understanding of what businesses actually do.

A senior figure at international multi-family office AlTi Tiedemann Global has said that he welcomes debate about challenges such as “greenwashing” and uneven data for ESG ideas, because it reminds investors that they must fully understand what they own.

Jed Emerson, chief impact officer at the organisation, recently spoke to this news service on how he sees his role and that of the wider business in pushing the agenda on sustainability and impact investing, while keeping on top of clients’ needs for returns.

“There is some level of irony in the current controversies surrounding impact/ESG investing given that the first rule is `know what you own’ and don’t invest in opportunities that are not in alignment with your values or beliefs; so aligning your capital with your vision of the world is where much of this work began – and, in the end, it is simply a question of opening our aperture of investment analysis to include a wider set of due diligence considerations,” Emerson said. “Debates regarding green or impact washing are good in that they end up sharpening the market’s understanding of what is and is not sound impact/ESG investment practice – separating wheat from chaff and bringing a deeper level of integrity to the work of those that remain,” he continued. “Evolving regulations are welcome in that they raise the bar on investment practice and over time will simply improve the investment offerings available to investors around the world.”

The term “greenwashing” has come to prominence as a result of some firms making their investments and practices seem “greener” than they are. (See stories here and here.) This, so critics say, fosters cynicism about the wider drive for decarbonisation, reducing forms of pollution, improving biodiversity, and other goals. It also comes at a time when political support for “green transition” policies is already creating pushback, such as over concerns about how the public will pay for it. 

Part of the issue may be that many firms moved into the ESG space in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, a traumatic event that hammered the reputation (not always fairly) of free market capitalism and financial markets. 

A large amount of traditional finance moved into the ESG/impact sector after 2008, Emerson said. “When you have upheaval, people will look for new avenues to avoid past mistakes and, in this case, to bring greater integrity into the investment process. I celebrate the entry of mainstream financial actors into the impact investing community/markets.” 

What is clear, from Emerson’s point of view, is that the term “ESG” is a great deal more prominent than when he started out focusing on helping homeless people and other problems that needed addressing more than three decades ago.

AITi Tiedemann Global is neither a small boutique house nor a large institutional player but somewhere in between. “There is also a direct relationship with the senior leadership team,” he said.

“I’ve been involved in purpose-driven capital for about 30 years,” he said. “Thirty years ago, things were very different and it [Impact/ESG] was not mainstream.”

In the 1980s, Emerson founded and ran a leading homeless youth services programme in San Francisco; he has also worked with various NGO and related organisations. In 1990, he was the founding director of a fund that invested in small and medium-sized enterprises, providing transitional employment for homeless people. He ran this fund for 11 years. Called REDF, the fund is a leader in venture philanthropy, social enterprise development and blended finance. While leading REDF, Emerson convened what is thought to be the first working group to formalise a methodology to calculate social return on investment – a framework which has been used by various for-profit and not-for-profit investors over subsequent years. 

AITi Tiedemann Global swings a large club in impact investment – it had $4.25 billion of dedicated impact investments as of 30 June. It is not the largest, but the direction of travel is clear.

“The amount [of ESG investment] has certainly increased and also the amount of inquiry from prospects,” Emerson said. 

The firm has been through a series of changes. In May this year AlTi Tiedemann Global acquired Singapore’s AL Wealth Partners. That deal came a few months after AlTi Tiedemann Global was born out of the merger of US-based Tiedemann Group and London’s Alvarium. The combined organisation oversees about $65 billion of assets under advice and administration.

Register for WealthBriefing today

Gain access to regular and exclusive research on the global wealth management sector along with the opportunity to attend industry events such as exclusive invites to Breakfast Briefings and Summits in the major wealth management centres and industry leading awards programmes