Company Profiles
Shining A Light On Risk, Returns With Performance Watcher
We talk to Performance Watcher by IBO, a Swiss organisation that uses an open-source model to collect and spread data to its network on how well, or not, investment portfolios perform when set against their agreed risk tolerances. It's a field of intense concern in today's volatile markets.
Informing clients whether portfolios are performing as they’re
supposed to – and are not drifting away from agreed risk levels –
has certainly been tested by dramatic market moves. And with
regulators tightening rules to make firms manage wealth in ways
that are “suitable,” the need for clear data is
paramount.
This news service
recently spoke to a UK-based outfit, Asset Risk
Consultants, on this matter. And we’ve also chatted to a
Switzerland-based house, Performance Watcher by IBO (Investment
by Objectives). Performance
Watcher now has a chief executive, Eric Bissonnier, who has
been in the job since July.
The fact that Performance Watcher decided to create a CEO post is
a sign of how this organisation, founded by former banker
Nicholas Hochstadter, has progressed. It was founded in the
middle of the previous decade. (See
an interview with it back in 2016.)
The firm is branching out from Switzerland to other markets, such
as the UK, Liechtenstein and Monaco.
Performance Watcher gathers daily price and related data from
banks and other financial organisations in return for giving
these contributors information showing whether their portfolios
are in line with, or drifting away from, stated objectives.
(Information is given on condition of anonymity, to protect
privacy.) IBO earns a living by licensing its software.
“Our mission is to provide, to all investors, transparency on the
quality of the performance of their managed portfolios in a
secure, simple and relevant manner. Built by private investors
for private investors, the aim is to create a community to share
and compare portfolio performance across risk levels and
reference currencies. We do not aim to provide advisory services
of any kind, to remain neutral in the assessment provided,”
Bissonnier told WealthBriefing.
The key to the business’s success is simplicity, he said.
“There hasn't been a change in the original model of getting
portfolios values and in/outs. This simplicity is core to our
business model as it makes it easy to get the data, and the daily
performance calculations are accurate. There have been
enhancements in the depth of measures, the comparison tools and
how we present them,” he continued.
“We also added features to manage and control universes of
portfolios for a given counterparty. And a new website is coming
in the next few weeks to create an enhanced user experience,” he
said.
With the FCA in the UK and other regulators such as Switzerland’s
FINMA cracking the whip over various firms, such as external
asset managers, ensuring that they have good performance data,
and seeing how it stacks up against risk, is no longer just a
“nice to have” item. It’s essential.
“Due to regulatory pressure, we see renewed interest from
independent asset managers and trustees, while banks are
increasingly confronted by larger clients asking about
performance. As Performance Watcher gets known, especially its
indices composed of actual portfolios, the availability of
performance data puts pressure on banks being asked, 'why is my
account not competitive?' Trustees must know about the
appropriateness of risk-taking by the investment managers of the
underlying assets, and we provide the only independent and
cost-effective, simple solution for that purpose,” Bissonnier
continued.
New Swiss regulations take final effect at the end of
2022 and, as this news service is hearing, hundreds of
smaller external asset managers and trustees face a demise. In
some cases, they are too old, or sub-scale, to be financially
viable. For those that want to continue and be on the right side
of the law, good and comprehensive data is essential. That’s good
for Performance Watcher and others in the space.
The requirement is for asset managers of private wealth to
monitor the consistency of the portfolio's management to their
mandates – this is also a requirement under the European
Union’s MiFID II regulations.
“Performance Watcher allows [users] to easily measure the results
of portfolio management decisions within a defined asset
allocation. Measuring differences in product mix, timing, and
risk-taking with position-based information is heavy to implement
and fraught with idiosyncratic divergences such as client bias,”
Bissonnier said.
“By measuring performance against an accurate sample of
portfolios with the same ex-ante level of risk, we quickly and
effectively bring out significant differences in the management
of the portfolios. The answers are easy to understand and readily
available. We provide a cost-effective solution for the latter,”
he said.
Bissonnier said his firm is interested in the UK trustee network,
pointing out that Liechtenstein and Monaco are a natural
extension of the Swiss private wealth network.
“We are exploring France's independent wealth manager market,
which is quite well structured and pervasive. In the long term,
we could pursue any market with delegated private wealth
management, including the UK, Germany, Scandinavia, Singapore,
Dubai and the US,” he said.
The macro background
Weak performance makes investors more discriminate. 'How much is
left in my pocket/portfolio?' becomes a central concern to
individuals, particularly in times of inflation,” Bissonnier
said.
“Asset management is a trust business, requiring both parties to
believe each other, and specifically the manager to be able to
answer
legitimate questions about performance,” he said.
The Performance Watcher platform isn’t about naming and shaming
funds that go astray.
“For many reasons, it is essential to keep the data accessible
but private. Client confidentiality and acceptance by the
managers are at the top of the list. Hence, the ability to have
answers to a user's specific questions without risking exposing
himself is critical. Also, we are independent of any financial
institution, advisor or consultant, reinforcing our case. We are
a network of anonymous clients who participate voluntarily and
may decide to expose themselves. But it's a choice, not something
we impose; we are not here to provide judgement on what people
do,” he said.
Bissionier brought up the case of a lawsuit where his firm’s data
helped decide the outcome of the case.
“About a year ago, an investment manager was sued by a beneficial
owner arguing his performance was not appropriate. With our data,
the defence proved that for the risk taken and approved by the
client, the performance was in line with expectations based on
comparisons with our community. The court acknowledged the
relevance of the information, and the case was dropped,” he said.
(For obvious reasons, the identities of the parties isn’t being
disclosed.)
WealthBriefing had to ask Bissonnier about journalists
who worry that too many wealth managers and their publicity
departments "mark their own homework." How difficult is it
to obtain conflict-free data on firms' performance to determine
whether they are fulfilling their promises?
“We get portfolio data (values and in/out flows) from the banks
or portfolio managers. While it would be plausible that a
counterparty would modify the data to make it look better, it is
implausible due to the constraints imposed by those data sources.
In addition, we track any historical or back-dated change in a
secure log, which raises questions when it is too frequent,
especially if it is always one way. We are very confident the
data provided is the reality of the performance.”
“Also, we do not create incentives for performance enhancement
since the data is not public by default. Finally, should our
report make its way to regulators, performance data has to be
correct [when measured] against internal data. Should the
investment manager become public, we do a due diligence on the
underlying data to make sure the data is indeed real, which would
reveal [any] discrepancy,” Bissonnier said.
Modern technology has made businesses such as Performance Watcher
more doable, he said.
“We could have done it way back when the spreadsheet started. But
keeping costs as low as we are for the clients, daily data for
accurate measurement and timely release of data is only possible
with technology. And, of course, the social aspect of it is
greatly facilitated by technology and acceptance,” he added.