M and A
Private Equity’s Stranglehold On RIA Mergers, Acquisitions
For many registered investment advisors, private equity backing is the norm if they want to expand via M&A. Not all observers are pleased with this trend, but whatever doubts there may be, the involvement of PE finance in the space appears to be well established.
Five years ago, private equity was just beginning to establish a
foothold in the financial advisory business. Today PE firms have
a stranglehold on the industry’s biggest firms and most
aggressive buyers.
The most recent example is Beacon Pointe Advisors’
acquisition of Altavista Wealth Management, a North Carolina
RIA with $600 million in assets under management.
In January 2020, Beacon Pointe was a scrappy RIA buyer, punching
above its weight while having made ten deals in the previous
decade, but finding itself being outbid by private equity-backed
rivals with deeper pockets. Since Abry Partners made a minority
investment in March of that year, followed by PE powerhouse KKR
last November, Beacon Pointe has gone on a tear, snapping up 18
firms in short order.
“Beacon Pointe is a good case study in the impact of private
equity in the M&A market,” said Dan Seivert, CEO of ECHELON Partners,
M&A valuation consultants and investment bankers. “They
worked hard and developed a network of firms but were losing
deals because they lacked two key elements: a deeper financial
foundation and expert advice on deal structure and winning
competitive bids. Partnering with private equity was an
inflection point for them.”
No more holdouts
Beacon Pointe president Matt Cooper agreed.
“Private equity was critical for us,” he said. “It validated the
viability of our balance sheet, enabled us to secure proper debt
facilities and lending capabilities and helped us think through
deals.”
In fact, in today’s hyper-competitive landscape, Cooper thinks it
would be “really hard” for a major RIA buyer to be successful
without private equity investment.
“It’s not just the capital,” he explained. “It’s having a plan,
having a dedicated deal team and being able to do due diligence
and integration. If you don’t have all of that in place to do at
scale, ultimately you’re going to be a target.”
Indeed, the last two years have seen a slew of major RIA
acquirers who had heretofore been holdouts accept PE investments,
including Mariner Wealth Advisors (Leonard Green & Partners);
Carson Group Holdings (Bain Capital); Savant Wealth Management
(Kelso & Company) and Creative Planning (General Atlantic).
Not coincidentally, “nearly all the most active strategic
acquirers in today’s market are backed by prominent private
equity firms,” ECHELON’s most recent RIA M&A Deal Report
pointed out, noting that “this has been a driving factor for the
industry’s record-breaking M&A activity in the past few
years.”
Seven of the ten most active acquirers last year had PE
investors: Focus Financial, Wealth Enhancement Group, Mercer
Advisors, Mariner Wealth Advisors, Captrust, Beacon Pointe and
Hightower Advisors.
Is short-term bad?
The most common criticism leveled at PE investors has been the
industry’s short-term time frame: private equity firms typically
seek returns of greater than 20 per cent within four to seven
years.
Seivert thinks the limited investment horizon “isn’t a big
factor” anymore. He pointed to RIAs such as Mercer Advisors
who have made multiple PR backers in the past decade but
have maintained stable management and produced stellar results.
What’s more, he noted, RIAs that haven’t accepted PE investments
have “lagged in growth.”
Abry Partner’s investment in Beacon Pointe lasted less than two
years. “That showed the business is doing great,” Cooper said.
What’s more, he added, a PE exit can provide a liquidity
opportunity for stakeholders and “make shareholders feel
good.”
Cooper also noted that even if there is a turnover in PE backing,
“management has a say in who the next partner will be because
that investor wants management to be happy."
Red flags
So what are the downsides of partnering with private equity?
“The biggest red flag is asymmetric information,” according to
Seivert. “A PE firms’ experience and knowledge is way higher than
the RIA they are investing in. An RIA can get taken in terms of
the deal structure not fully understanding deal points like
preferences and rights. There can be quite a disparity of power
and returns if the deal isn’t structured properly.”
A 2020 post by Park Sutton Advisors, the New York-based
investment banking firm specializing in RIA M&A also noted PE
firms’ penchant for “sophisticated [deal] structures.”
Deal points can include requirements for “preference amounts,”
where the PE investor receives a certain percentage return on
their capital invested before profits are distributed to other
shareholders. PE firms may also insist on a “liquidation
preference” that they receive on their invested capital upon the
sale of the company as well as governance provisions, which may
be onerous.
Nonetheless, with as many as 80 private equity firms sniffing
around the RIA market, no one expects PE involvement to abate
anytime soon.
“PE’s influence on RIA M&A has never been stronger,” said
Brian Lauzon, managing director of InCap Group. “The PE fund
sponsors continue to be believers in the inorganic growth
opportunities available to larger wealth management firms. And PE
capital typically does come with an expectation of aggressive
inorganic growth.”