WM Market Reports
Experiences Trump Luxury Goods For Millennials; Prices Edge Higher - Julius Baer

A report on the luxury goods and services market in Asia shows a generally buoyant picture - with some local variation, and argues that some angst about economics and politics must be set in perspective.
  Millennials who fall into the high net worth category are more
  likely to spend on what they think of as exclusive experiences
  rather than items such as Swiss wristwatches, fast cars or
  sumptuous houses, according to a Julius Baer report on
  Asia wealth trends. 
  
  The Zurich-listed lender, which says Asia is its second home
  market, reports that its customised index of luxury spending
  shows continued growth in this market across the region.
  
  This population cohort lives in an “age of plenty” but is also
  scarred by a decade of economic and political turmoil that tends
  to encourage more focus on quality of experience and less on
  material possessions – at least up to a point, the Swiss bank
  says in a 70-page report. 
  
  The bank said its Julius Baer Lifestyle Index for 2016/2017 Index
  rose by 2.07 per cent in local currency and 1.42 per cent in
  dollar terms. This kept pace with regional inflation trends
  suggesting luxury retailers managed to retain pricing power for
  so-called Veblen goods – luxury goods that do not follow the
  usual laws of supply and demand.
  
  “Our index remains on an upward trajectory since its launch seven
  years ago, demonstrating that there remains enormous demand for
  luxury goods and services in Asia, notwithstanding short-term
  asset price fluctuations,” the bank continued. 
  
  The index measures the cost for a basket of goods and services
  typically consumed by HNW individuals in Asia. The bank said to
  capture changing preferences and those of Millennials, it added
  fine dining (“degustation menu at a top-rated restaurant”) as a
  new item to its index which brings the number of goods and
  services tracked to 22.
  
  As far as fine dining is concerned, Hong Kong is the most
  expensive city in Asia a cost of $287, followed by Singapore
  ($283) and Shanghai ($280). On the other hand, the lowest such
  fine dining meal is in Mumbai. Across all Asian markets measured,
  the average price has risen by 1.2 per cent from a year
  ago. 
  
  Examining underlying forces at work, Julius Baer said 13 out of
  the 22 items measured saw price increases. Among the falling
  prices, university fees fell by 4.3 per cent as the
  dollar-equivalent cost for one of its executive programmes in the
  UK fell because of the large fall in sterling after the UK’s
  Bexit vote in June 2016. In local currency terms however, the UK
  programme had marked its costs higher by 4.9 per cent.
  
  Several trends have driven prices higher, Julius Baer said, such
  as returning consumer confidence in China, and customers
  “reshoring” the luxury purchases they once made on overseas trips
  back home. The third factor is Asian currency movements, the bank
  said. 
  
  Switching to the example of business class flights and price
  trends with flights from 11 Asian cities to New York and London,
  there was a mixed picture over the past 12 months, the report
  found. On average, prices declined 1.5 per cent in dollar terms.
  Flights departing from Manila in the Philippines fell the
  sharpest, down 25.2 per cent, while Singapore’s fell by 13.1 per
  cent. The heaviest increases were from Seoul in South Korea, up
  25.2 per cent, and Taipei in Taiwan, up 15.8 per cent.
  
  Turning to real estate, property prices remain the highest in
  Hong Kong, Tokyo and Singapore while they are least expensive in
  Jakarta, Bangkok and Manila. On a per square metre basis, the
  average cost for prime real estate in Asia this year stands at
  $19,151, with the mantle for most expensive going to Hong Kong
  (U$51,595 psm) and the most competitive going to Kuala Lumpur
  ($3,363 psm).
  
  “Despite much hang-wringing by economists and analysts alike, the
  worst-case scenario for markets has not materialised. At the time
  of writing, equity indexes have rallied to a series of records
  while volatility has fallen to multi-decade lows as investors
  shrug off potential headwinds. This optimism is reflected in the
  findings for our Julius Baer Lifestyle Index this year which
  registered higher valuations on improved consumer sentiment and
  economic conditions in Asia,” it said.
  
  A sense of perspective
  In its preamble, the report’s authors seek to counter some of the
  standard narrative of people fearing that the days of relatively
  fast economic growth seen in recent decades are over. 
  
  “The data tells a different story, however. Succinctly, the world
  has never been in better shape, especially when economic output
  is measured on a per head basis. In fact, work done by
  researchers at the University of Groningen makes this point in
  dramatic fashion by constructing very long-term times series.
  They argue that for centuries prior to 1800, humanity had seen
  little growth. However, from 1945 onwards, that growth rate began
  to surge,” the report’s authors say.
  
  The report tries to answer its question that if the world has
  been so wealthy, where does the “doom and gloom” in some
  political circles come from? It replies by noting that in the US,
  where some indicators suggest the economy is booming, there is
  also a split between people in full-time jobs and those that work
  one or more part-time jobs, the latter being the cheaper option
  for employers. “This duality in the labour market is visible not
  only in the US, but is also notable in Japan and Korea, among
  others. In short, the US jobs recovery has been tinged by the
  persistence of part-time or irregular jobs, as opposed to
  full-time work,” the report says.
  
  “In the US alone, there are over five million people who are
  working part-time jobs but want full-time positions. Some
  observers now worry that the global labour market has endured a
  structural break whereby sought after full-time jobs with higher
  job security and other benefits are scarcer in favour of
  part-time work. While this may be good for some, it is certainly
  not for all. In general, dual labour markets are an impediment to
  growth. This is because part-time workers are unable or unwilling
  to make investments (such as buying a home) as financial
  commitments often require the knowledge of a relatively more
  secure and stable income,” the report says.