Alt Investments
CalPERS's Hedge Fund Divestment Not So Far Part Of Broader Trend - Industry

The decision by the $398 billion California Public Employees' Retirement System's (CalPERS) to abandon investing in hedge funds over cost and return complaints is unlikely to herald a sea-change in the industry, people in the sector say.
The decision by the $398 billion California Public Employees'
Retirement System's (CalPERS) to abandon investing in hedge funds
over cost and return complaints is unlikely to herald a
sea-change in the industry, people in the sector say.
The decision by the pension fund to divest its entire $4 billion
exposure to the sector created media headlines because its
investment decisions are often treated as a bellwether for how
large institutions view certain asset classes. It suggests some
general dissatisfaction the $2.8 trillion hedge fund sector,
according to Osterweis Capital Management, a US-based firm.
“Hedge funds have largely disappointed and have become
institutionally-oriented absolute return strategies. They
actually managed to lose a fair amount of money in 2008 - less
than the stock market but still a lot of money in absolute
terms,” it said in a recent equity outlook paper, published in
July.
According to Chicago-based Hedge Fund Research, there have been a
total of $57 billion; of the total of $2.8 trillion of global
hedge fund assets, 43 per cent of that is institutional. As far
as returns are concerned, the HFRI Fund Weighted Composite Index
rose 1.6 per cent in August, the strongest month since February,
with gains across all strategies, led by a rise in macro &
commodity trading advisor strategies. Over the year to date so
far, the MSCI World Index of developed countries’ shares shows
total returns (capital plus reinvested dividends) of 6.6 per
cent, beating the HFRI Fund Weighted Composite Index for the same
period at 4.1 per cent.
“I think the [CalPERS] decision is leading them in a different
direction to the rest of the industry in terms of how allocations
are going,” Ken Heinz, president at HFR, told this publication in
a phone call. CalPERS has specific return and cost requirements
that fit with its status as a large pension fund so its decision
is not necessarily particularly significant. The organisation has
the financial buying power to be strong in negotiating on fees.
Even if it no longer invests in custom-built hedge fund vehicles
that doesn’t mean it will completely abandon hedge fund
strategies, he said.
In fact, far from it being the case that institutions are
reducing hedge fund exposures, more are trying to cut
conventional exposures to equities and they want more diversified
exposures, he said. “More pension funds are looking to reduce
their equity market Beta,” Heinz said.
eVestment, a firm operating in the alternatives investment space,
said its August asset flows report showed interest in increasing
hedge fund exposures continues. Investors added an estimated
$12.6 billion in August, it said; the eVestment figure for total
AuM is larger than the HFR figure, at $3.068 trillion.