Legal
Former Footballers To Sue Advisors Of Film Investment Scheme
The law firm acting for the claimants said their clients were misinformed that the tax reliefs had been approved by HMRC and were permitted by law.
A group of 45 former Premier League footballers is suing
professional advisors linked to a film investment scheme that had
been in trouble with the tax authorities.
Peters &
Peters, the London law firm acting for the claimants, told
WealthBriefing that the former footballers are among 122
investors who took part in the Ingenious Media
scheme between 2000 and 2013 and who are now taking legal
action.
The law firm has issued proceedings against the Ingenious group
and three of its directors, including its founder, Patrick
McKenna. The lawyers also confirmed that claims are being brought
against professional agents and financial advisors who sold,
recommended or marketed the investments, as well as several banks
that financed the deals.
Ingenious Media is a British media investment and advisory group
founded in 1998 by McKenna. The firm has already had its
share of incidents involving tax issues.
In August 2016, HM Revenue and Customs won a tax avoidance
battle against the Ingenious Film Partnership's avoidance
scheme.
A partner at Peters & Peters, Jonathan Tickner, who is leading
the case, said: “We are acting for 122 clients seeking redress
against Ingenious Media and other professional advisors for
losses incurred as a result of their investment in film tax
schemes. Clients include former Premiership footballers.
Investors have all suffered significant financial losses as a
result of these schemes being mis-sold to them as legitimate
opportunities in which to invest in film or other media
businesses. They were misinformed that the tax reliefs had been
approved by HMRC and were permitted by law."
Tickner added: “This is particularly hard for sporting
professionals whose earning potential is at its peak for only a
few years. A number of those affected are now facing
bankruptcy.”
The lawyers said that a case management conference was likely to
take place in October. The firm refused to name its clients. A
spokesperson for Ingenious Media said, "these claims are without
merit and will be vigorously defended".
Tax benefits
Financial issues have hit sports personalities recently,
including Boris Becker’s bankruptcy, which
was reported by this publication. As sports stars look to
make investments to diversify their portfolio, they need to make
safe bets, which is what RBC
Wealth Management’s Sandy Swinton said to this publication
recently.
According to Miles Dean, managing partner of Milestone
International Tax, the issues with the tax man when dealing with
these types of investments is because the tax benefits are placed
as more important than the investment.
"Caveat emptor – a fool and their money. It is highly likely that
all investors will have signed waivers so the burden of proof
will be very high,” said Dean. “The most common reason for
investment schemes failing foul of the tax courts is that the
investment element is secondary and the tax benefits primary. The
scheme providers will argue differently, but the investments were
not really investments. They were designed to create losses (an
investment usually produces a return) against which income could
be offset; neither the agent, the independent financial advisor
nor the footballer would fully understand the scheme they were
participating in, other than believing it would reduce their tax
bill,” Dean said.
Dean, who is a founding partner of Milestone International Tax
with over 20 years' experience of advising clients on a wide
range of international tax issues, added: “Until 2013, the tax
avoidance industry was rampant in this practice and Ingenious,
together with their appointed QCs, were at the top of the food
chain. Football is rife with greed and corruption from FIFA
downwards. The problem is that most footballers tend to have very
limited knowledge of tax law, not least very complex tax driven
schemes, and their agents are no better. It is likely that many
of the IFA’s selling the schemes wouldn’t fully understand the
complexities of the arrangements at hand."