Compliance
Deutsche Bank Reaches Official $7.2 Billion Settlement With US Department Of Justice

The US Department of Justice originally sought a penalty of $14 billion from the German lender.
Deutsche Bank will pay $7.2 billion to settle a case with the US
Department of Justice over its sale of toxic mortgage securities
in the run-up to the 2008 financial tsunami, the government
agency said earlier this week.
The colossal fine represents the largest resolution for the
conduct of a single entity in misleading investors in residential
mortgage-backed securities, the DoJ said in a statement.
Previously, the biggest penalty was paid by Citigroup in 2014,
which amounted to $7 billion.
“Deutsche Bank did not merely mislead investors: it contributed
directly to an international financial crisis. The cost of this
misconduct is significant: Deutsche Bank will pay a $3.1 billion
civil penalty, and provide an additional $4.1 billion in relief
to homeowners, borrowers, and communities harmed by its
practices. Our settlement makes clear that institutions like
Deutsche Bank cannot evade responsibility for the great cost
exacted by their conduct,” said attorney general Loretta
Lynch.
At the time of writing, the bank's stock price was down 0.74
per cent.
John Cryan, Deutsche Bank's chief executive, said that the firm's
conduct between 2005 and 2007 fell short of standards and was
"unacceptable". He said the bank had exited many of the
underlying activities and improved standards.
The Frankfurt-headquartered lender announced it had reached the
agreement in principle with US authorities on December 23 of last
year.
In September 2016, the bank's stock price hit a record low after
the bank acknowledged the DoJ's opening demand of $14
billion.
Earlier this month, Deutsche
Bank agreed to pay $95 million to settle a US government
lawsuit alleging the group committed tax fraud for using
shell companies to conceal significant tax liabilities from the
Internal Revenue Service in 2000.
Since the announcement, the
German banking behemoth has moved to curtail the use of
electronic messaging services by its employees, but said the
decision was not a result of a regulatory order.