Strategy
When Fraud Detection Fails: How Banks Must Rebuild Trust In Payments Infrastructure

There’s a saying that it is hard to put a broken vase together after it has been damaged, and reputations for trust and efficiency can suffer hard-to-fix reputational damage. But there are ways to handle the task, the author of this article says.
The following commentary, which speaks to concerns about cybersecurity, fraud and other problems that banks and wealth managers face, comes from Roman Eloshvili (pictured below), who is founder of XData Group, a business-to-business development company, focused on the European sector.
Roman Eloshvili
Recently, it was reported that German banks froze over
€10 billion in PayPal payments amid suspected fraud triggered by
failures in PayPal’s own detection systems. So, when fraud
detection fails, how can banks rebuild trust in their payment
infrastructure?
The editors are pleased to share these views; the usual editorial
disclaimers apply to views of guest writers. To comment, email
tom.burroughes@wealthbriefing.com
and amanda.cheesley@clearviewpublishing.com
In our society filled with hacks, phishing schemes, DDoS attacks,
and relentless fraud attempts, we can’t just depend on automation
anymore. Sure, smarter KYC processes help, but let’s be real:
payments are more than just machines communicating with each
other – they’re about people putting their trust in other
people. And when a false flag locks a customer out, it’s not the
protocol that keeps them loyal; it’s how the bank treats them at
that moment.
Fraud alerts will always need to be quick, but speed without a
touch of empathy can feel cold. Sometimes, the real chance to
shine during a crisis is to genuinely show that you care, not
just that your system is functioning properly.
Transparency and collaboration: A mutual
contract
Trusting that money is secure – whether it’s in banks,
fintech, or the entire financial system – isn’t something
you can just demand. It’s something you must earn, and that
process can be slow and, at times, quite painful. When negligence
creeps in, it leads to frustration. And once that frustration
takes hold, companies begin to lose their grip on clients
– gradually, but inevitably.
From my perspective, this is a bit of a taboo topic. Very few of
us are comfortable admitting that silence can be far more
frightening than receiving bad news. Stepping away from the theme
of fraud detection, in everyday life, a quick and coordinated
response – even if it’s not flawless – can provide
relief and help maintain trust. Ultimately, transparency is the
foundation of any healthy relationship, whether it’s with your
customers, partners, or even your own employees.
The deluge
I can still picture late August 2025. German banks suddenly hit
the brakes on over €10 billion ($11,755) in payments linked to
PayPal after a wave of “suspicious” debits came through. On the
surface, it seemed like just another blip. But if you were even
slightly connected to the industry, you could feel the tremors
– trust was shaken.
Payments are meant to be the reliable backbone of fintech. When
that foundation wobbles, no amount of carefully crafted apologies
are going to fix it. I know a few people who found
themselves in the thick of it, and what they shared wasn’t just
frustration with the technology – it was a deep sense of
disappointment. That incident made me rethink the fundamentals:
how we assess risk, how we build solid partnerships, and how we
safeguard customers without stifling them. These concens go
beyond just fixing code; they’re all about maintaining
credibility.
AI-powered anomaly detection: From reactive to
proactive
Take Feedzai’s collaboration with UK banks as a prime example:
their machine learning tools are revealing patterns that human
analysts might overlook. Sometimes, all it takes is a simple
phone call, a clear explanation, or even just saying, “We messed
up.” That touch of humanity can make all the difference between
losing a client for good or keeping them around for another
decade.
Chart 1. KYC is no longer a checkbox – it’s a capital priority. As AI, biometrics, and blockchain reshape compliance, fintechs are pouring billions into smarter, faster, and more resilient identity infrastructure. Source: https://kpmg.com/xx/en/what-we-do/industries/financial-services/pulse-of-fintech.html)
Oversight: Internal and external
I’ve never really been on board with outsourcing compliance. It
tends to stretch accountability thin and leaves regulators
peering into confusing black boxes. So, what’s a better way? It’s
all about finding the right balance between innovation and
resilience. Take a look at the UK’s Department for Work and
Pensions – they set a great example in 2023. They managed to
block £1 billion ($1.35 billion) in incorrect Universal Credit
payments before any money was disbursed. That’s being proactive,
not just reactive.
Far too often, banks only step in after things have gone south.
But real trust is built by preventing those messes from happening
in the first place.
The risk of overcompliance
Fraud doesn’t typically make a grand entrance. What we usually
see is its quiet slippage through side doors and even through
those little cracks in the wall that you might have overlooked.
That’s why relying on just one, even the most
popular tool such as SAS Fraud Management or FICO
Falcon, isn’t enough. You need a whole arsenal: behaviour checks,
device fingerprints, velocity limits, biometrics – each one
needs to be tested individually.
This isn’t just a theory. According to UK Finance, banks managed
to prevent £1.25 billion in unauthorised fraud in 2023
– that’s about 64 pence saved for every £1 that was
attempted. That’s how layered defences are supposed to work.
But here’s the catch: fraudsters are always evolving. If our
defences don’t keep up, they’ll eventually find a way to outsmart
us.
Towards a resilient payments future
The PayPal freeze wasn’t a one-off. In January 2025, the US
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau hit Block (more precisely, a
famous Jack Dorsey’s Cash App) with $175 million in fines for
weak fraud controls. In India, regulators repeatedly flagged
Paytm and UPI apps for loose KYC, sometimes forcing temporary
shutdowns. All these cases keep bothering me more. Although I
can’t provide any straightforward unambiguous remedy at this
point, I offer to open a broader discussion on how to effectively
implement preventive fraud detection without compromising trust.