Tax
UK Plays Down IHT Crackdown Risks; Law Firm Warns Over Avoidance Schemes

Reports warn of a fresh flurry of anti-avoidance crackdowns by the UK concerning ways of reducing inheritance tax bills. An official has told this publication such fears are exaggerated. A law firm says a new anti-avoidance drive is being launched.
It may seem a few weeks away, but the onset of autumn in the UK
usually sees an increase in media speculation about the horrible
things governments intend to do to “crack down” on forms of tax
avoidance as the parliamentary season looms. A media report has
raised alarms of increasingly aggressive moves against taxpayers,
while a law firm has also highlighted risks around avoidance
schemes.
Yesterday, the Daily Telegraph newspaper reported that
the UK coalition government intends to stop wealthy people
“benefiting from complicated schemes that allow them to
dramatically reduce the amount they will owe after their death”.
The report said that “under plans put out for consultation, HM
Revenue & Customs would have powers to subject people minimising
inheritance tax to “accelerated payment” laws, meaning they would
be forced to pay up front if officials suspect them of using new
schemes to avoid tax”. It went on to note that some experts fear
that taxpayers will be treated as “guilty until proven
innocent”.
When WealthBriefing asked HM Treasury, the department
responsible for authorising any such move by HMRC, about the
story, a spokesperson said: “The government will not ask be
asking taxpayers to make an accelerated payment of inheritance
tax - which is due on death - during their lifetime. As part of
the ongoing consultation, we are seeking views on tackling
inheritance tax avoidance schemes and no final decisions have
been taken”.
"The proposals would only affect a small minority of wealthy
individuals actively seeking to avoid inheritance tax.
Accelerated payments will not apply more widely to IHT trust
charge changes, unless the trust arrangement is part of a tax
avoidance scheme disclosed under DOTAS,” the spokesperson said,
adding: “Under inheritance tax rules a couple do not pay tax on
the first £650,000 ($1.091 million) of their estate on
death.”
Tax avoidance demands
Law firm Winckworth Sherwood said that 33,000 people are at risk
as tax avoidance demands hit doormats this month. It said
individuals that have taken part in one or more of the 800 tax
avoidance schemes listed by HM Revenue & Customs, the tax
authority, in July 2014 can expect to receive demands this month
for prompt payment.
Using new powers introduced through the Finance Act 2014, HMRC
will start to issue Follower Notices and Accelerated Payment
Notices to those it believes have taken part in deliberate tax
avoidance schemes, giving people just 90 days to settle demands
that could be in excess of £1 million.
“This is the most significant of the many clampdowns by HMRC on
those taxpayers that have engaged in tax avoidance schemes and
practices. Individuals will be naturally concerned when
they receive these demands and it is entirely possible that they
will not be able to afford to pay straightaway and face the
threat of bankruptcy,” Simon Newsham, a partner in the tax team
at the law firm, said.
The firm explained that a Follower Notice can be issued by HMRC
where it believes there has been a court or tribunal decision in
a case that is similar to the tax treatment that has been claimed
by the taxpayer. Where a Follower Notice has been issued,
the taxpayer will be required to amend their tax return or claim
or withdraw any appeal against an HMRC closure notice, assessment
or determination.
Accelerated Payment Notices are issued where a taxpayer has
entered into a tax avoidance arrangement that has been notified
to HMRC under the disclosure of tax avoidance scheme rules
(DOTAS) or where a counteraction has taken place under the
general anti-avoidance rules (GAAR).
“We expect to see a raft of claims from individual receiving
these notices against their advisors who may have encouraged them
to participate in these schemes without fully explaining or
understanding the risks involved,” Newsham said.
The profile of such schemes has risen in recent years, with
public figures such as stand-up comedian Jimmy Carr, among
others, being pilloried for using forms of tax avoidance. The
issue also highlights debate over what is the dividing line
between tax evasion, which is a criminal offence under English
law, and avoidance, which typically is not. Some figures in the
wealth management industry have warned that legitimate tax
planning has been rendered unworkable.