Compliance
UK Fraudbuster Vows To Tighten Grip On Miscreants, Urges Tougher Anti-Bribery Laws

The head of the UK body responsible for probing fraud, money laundering and bribery – among other crimes – vowed to tighten the screws on wrongdoers while he also called for tougher penalties on firms.
The head of the UK body responsible for probing fraud, money
laundering and bribery – among other crimes – vowed to tighten
the screws on wrongdoers while he also called for tougher
penalties on firms.
In a speech delivered at a symposium in Cambridge, UK, earlier
this week, David Green, QC, director of the Serious Fraud
Office, highlighted a raft of cases against firms and
individuals at a time when, globally, there have been heavy fines
on global wrongdoers for AML lapses, market abuse, and other
failings.
One area where Green wanted to see even tougher action is the UK
Bribery Act, which already has wide-ranging powers, going beyond
the shores of the UK.
“I will also continue to speak in favour of amendment of S7 of
the [UK] Bribery Act to create the offence of a company failing
to prevent acts of financial crime by its associated persons.
That would significantly increase our reach on corporate
criminality, and is an idea that appears to be gaining traction,”
Green said.
The caseload of the SFO is large, he said, referring to impending
trials covering issues such as LIBOR-rigging and other scandals
that have rocked financial markets in recent years. “We have much
in the pipeline: as of today some 37 defendants await trail in 12
cases. The size of the white collar criminal legal sector serving
the City of London is, I suggest, evidence in itself that there
is a lot more work out there for the SFO,” he said.
He noted that in the case of LIBOR benchmark manipulation, 12
individuals have been charged so far; other areas of
investigation/legal action include the circumstances surrounding
Barclays’s recapitalisation in 2008; allegations of bribery
surrounding Rolls Royce concerning attempted moves to enter
certain markets and an ongoing money laundering probe concerning
an “old regime Ukrainian politician”. (This person hasn’t, as far
as this publication can determine, been named so far.)
“Many of our cases concern blue-chip UK companies. Such companies
may be household names whose performance is of great importance
to the UK economy and every citizen would wish them well: they
are the good guys. SFO investigations involving iconic British
enterprises do not enhance our popularity, and some may feel a
certain tension between wanting the law enforced and wanting our
companies to prosper,” Green said.
“These corporates have real clout amongst politicians and in the
City. Some use the media to influence and shape public opinion.
Those facts alone underline the need for a visibly independent
investigator and prosecutor to have the conduct of these cases,”
he continued.
“Some of these investigations are very large indeed. On LIBOR,
for instance, we have some 70 staff engaged. Like any other
government department, we must have budgetary discipline and take
our place in line with other priorities. In fact, we have had a
10 per cent increase in our budget this year,” he said.