Legal
Standard Chartered Fails To Strike Out $2.7 billion 1MDB-Linked Claim In Singapore

The bank reiterated its point that the claims against it are “without merit.”
The Singapore High Court has upheld the dismissal of Standard
Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited's strike-out application,
clearing the way for a $2.7 billion claim brought by liquidators
to proceed to trial. This is the latest twist in the long-running
legal fallout from the 1MDB scandal.
The ruling, handed down on 30 June, dismisses the bank's appeal
against an earlier decision refusing to throw out the suit at a
preliminary stage. The claim was brought by the court-appointed
liquidators of three British Virgin Islands companies
– Alsen Chance Holdings Limited, Blackstone Asia Real Estate
Partners Limited and Brightstone Jewellery Limited – which
the liquidators allege were used to channel misappropriated 1MDB
funds.
The liquidators claim that Standard
Chartered authorised more than 100 intra-bank transfers
between 2009 and 2013 that helped conceal the movement of
misappropriated funds, while ignoring multiple red
flags.
Commenting on the decision, the liquidators said: "We welcome the
High Court's decision on 30 June 2026 to uphold the dismissal of
Standard Chartered Bank's strike-out application. This outcome
reaffirms that the claims against the bank – including claims of
dishonest assistance and breach of the bank's duties of
reasonable skill and care – should properly proceed to trial,
where the evidence can be fully examined."
In a statement emailed yesterday to WealthBriefingAsia,
Standard Chartered said: "Standard Chartered will continue to
vigorously defend against the claims. The recent decision in the
bank’s strike-out appeal is not a decision on the merits of those
claims. In any case, we respectfully disagree with the court’s
decision and intend to apply for permission to file a further
appeal.
“We would like to reinforce that these are claims against the
bank brought by shell companies that misappropriated funds from
1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) and had no legitimate
business. We emphatically reject the claims of these fraudulent
entities. Their claims are without merit,” the bank said, adding
that its position has not changed since its 2 July 2025
statement. In that message, the bank said: “The liquidators
acting for these companies have publicly stated that these were
shell companies which did not engage in any legitimate business
and were linked to fugitives Low Taek Jho and his associate Eric
Tan. The companies are not affiliates of 1MDB. They operated
under false pretences and acted as a conduit for funds
misappropriated from 1MDB to launder monies. The transactions at
issue date back to 2010. We reported the transaction activities
of these companies, both before and at the time we shut their
accounts in early 2013, and fully cooperated with the
investigating authorities.”
The claimants are represented by Lok Vi Ming SC, Joseph Lee, Mohd
Haireez, Tan Kah Wai and Koo Jin Rong of LVM Law Chambers LLC.
Lim Chee Wee Partnership of Kuala Lumpur acts as global
co-ordinating counsel for all 1MDB-related asset recovery efforts
in Malaysia and abroad. The liquidators of the claimants are
Angela Barkhouse and Toni Shukla, both of Kroll.
The liquidators added: "The liquidators remain resolute in their
commitment to recover the assets misappropriated from the
companies, and to hold accountable those responsible for
facilitating the misappropriation of said assets as part of the
wider fraud involving 1MDB. The liquidators welcome the dismissal
of the bank's appeal as a positive step forward for their
recovery efforts which are ultimately for the benefit of the
people of Malaysia."
A long-running dispute
The Singapore High Court dismissed Standard Chartered's initial
application to strike out the suit in November 2025, prompting
the bank to appeal that decision – the appeal that has now itself
been dismissed.
The case sits within the broader, decade-long effort to recover
funds from the 1MDB scandal, which US investigators have said
involved the misappropriation of more than $4.5 billion between
2009 and 2015. The saga became one of the largest financial fraud
cases in history, drawing in a former Malaysian prime minister
and a number of high-profile international banks.