Compliance
SEC Chair: Calling Something A Crypto-Currency Doesn't Mean We Can't Regulate It

His remarks came just a day after trading of the hotly-anticipated bitcoin futures began on an exchange run by Cboe Global Markets.
Labelling a digital asset as a crypto-currency does not
necessarily mean issuers will be exempt from regulations, the
chairman of Wall Street’s main watchdog has warned.
Although there is a general consensus that crypto-currencies are
not securities and that their offer and sale is beyond the scope
of the Securities
and Exchange Commission, whether this proves correct will
depend on an asset’s characteristics and use, Jay Clayton said in
a statement yesterday.
“In any event, it is clear that, just as the SEC has a sharp
focus on how US dollar, euro and Japanese yen transactions affect
our securities markets, we have the same interests and
responsibilities with respect to crypto-currencies,” he said.
“This extends, for example, to securities firms and other market
participants that allow payments to be made in crypto-currencies,
set up structures to invest in or hold crypto-currencies, or
extend credit to customers to purchase or hold
crypto-currencies.”
Clayton’s announcement came a day after trading of the
hotly-anticipated bitcoin futures began on an exchange run by
Cboe Global Markets, sparking a swift spike in the
crypto-currency’s price as the provider’s website experienced
outages due to heavy traffic.
Clayton said that in order to answer questions surrounding
crypto-currencies’ legality, and whether they should be subject
to certain regulations, will require “in-depth analysis”, and
“answers will differ depending on many factors”.
Until this is carried out, he has urged what he called “main
street investors” - those investing on their own behalf - to be
wary of crypto investment opportunities guaranteeing returns that
seem “too good to be true”, as they often entail amplified risks
because of overseas exposure and lacking regulation.
Such investment opportunities often come in the form of initial
coin offerings (ICOs), which are a meld of crowdfunding and
initial public offerings (IPOs) used by crypto start-ups to grow
their business. However, unlike an IPO which gives an investor
shared ownership in the company being floated, ICOs typically
reward investors with a new crypto-currency whose value is
directly tied to the business’ performance in exchange for an
established crypto-currency, such as bitcoin.
In most markets, ICOs are not currently regulated, and therefore
associated fraud risks are inherently higher. However, the SEC
earlier this year said that some digital tokens issued through
ICOs could be considered securities and, therefore, be subjected
to US securities laws.
“I believe that initial coin offerings – whether they represent
offerings of securities or not – can be effective ways for
entrepreneurs and others to raise funding, including for
innovative projects,” Clayton said. “However, any such activity
that involves an offering of securities must be accompanied by
the important disclosures, processes and other investor
protections that our securities laws require. A change in
the structure of a securities offering does not change the
fundamental point that when a security is being offered, our
securities laws must be followed.”
Bitcoin, the first crypto-currency launched in 2009, has seen its
value skyrocket this year from less than $1,000 in January to
highs exceeding $17,000 this month.
Ethereum, the second-largest crypto-currency, has also enjoyed
strong gains, as its value has soared more than 7,000 per cent
since the start of this year.
Litecoin, another rival, since yesterday has climbed nearly 100
per cent to reach an all-time high of nearly $300 per coin.