Strategy
Rebuilding Private Client Trust: Real Customer Relationship Management

The key factor in building better, more lasting customer relationships in wealth management is trust. The effect of low trust may not be readily apparent as it is most often experienced as an opportunity cost, - in what is not done, but it is nonetheless stifling to growth.
The key factor in building better, more lasting customer
relationships in wealth management is trust. The effect of low
trust may not be readily apparent as it is most often experienced
as an opportunity cost, - in what is not done, but it is
nonetheless stifling to growth.
In the current climate of falling returns, trust in private
client business, as in all financial institutions, will suffer.
It is likely to be those wealth managers that take an honest and
active approach to nurturing client trust that will emerge least
scathed.
A Definition of Trust
Trust is about much more than professional competence and honest
dealing. It has an emotional as well as a rational element and is
essentially about relationships. The person doing the trusting,
the client, must believe the other party is genuinely concerned
for their interests, and they can only acquire this belief over
time, by repeated reinforcement.
Four main dimensions to trust have been suggested:
The first three must be maximised:
Credibility - demonstrating (rather than talking about) technical
competence, being seen to be truthful and not concealing
anything.
Reliability - proving you can be depended on, repeatedly keeping
promises, meeting expectations and showing that your actions
match your words
Intimacy - being close enough to understand and anticipate the
other’s needs. Good salespeople do this, but are distrusted if
they are seen to be pretending friendship to win a sale.
And the fourth minimised:
Self-orientation – suggesting we are thinking more about
ourselves rather than the client.
Any person or organisation seeking the trust of others must
satisfy all four of these requirements, it is no good being
brilliantly competent if your service is inconsistent and, most
crucially, trust can be destroyed if you are seen to act in a
self-serving way.
The Determinants of Trust in Wealth
Management
Our own research in these markets suggests these four dimensions
can be related directly to private client business.
The positive dimensions are the subject of regular management
meetings:
Credibility
• Competitive products relevant to market conditions and client
needs
• Performance track record
• Absolute benchmarks, rather than relative measures
• Transparency over available options and inherent risks &
charges
Reliability
• Continuity of staff, premises and reporting
• Consistency of delivery
• Clear response to crises, both client and market induced
Intimacy
• Real customer knowledge, not relying mechanically on a CRM
system
• Cultural affinity.
• Providing proactive advice without appearing to be maximising
cross-selling opportunities.
But the negative dimension is often unseen by wealth
managers:
Self-orientation
• Mis-selling and pressure from highly incentivised sales
staff
• Non-transparent charging or charges bearing little relation to
what has been done for instance a percentage of assets under
management rather than a fee for service.
• Biasing selections towards in-house funds rather than those of
other firms
• Making changes to the service without inherent benefits to
clients
And this is where true damage can be done. Without these failings
failure in the positive dimensions can be forgiven.
The Opportunity Cost of Low Trust
All these aspects of trust have a bearing on client behaviours,
but their impact is not always overt. The result of damaged
trust may not be defection, but clients may not transfer
additional funds to the firm, provide full information about
their circumstances, or introduce friends. In an introducer
context, the opportunity cost of a transgression can be enormous,
and often not seen by corporate management.
The insidious effect of these opportunity costs is that
apparently rational strategies around cost-reduction or pricing
can damage the long-term capacity of the firm to grow.
Case Studies – The Experience of Wealth
Managers
Research with clients of a wealth manager in 2002 revealed that
clients were concerned their portfolio values had fallen – some
had paper losses of 40 per cent – 50 per cent. However their
views of the wealth manager, who had until then concentrated on
customer service, were very positive.
After two years of business integration following an acquisition,
requiring a lot of communication around back office integration,
changes to product, relationship management and pricing, we
repeated the research as part of a strategy refresh.
Portfolios had recovered but perceptions had become very
negative. Clients attributed their gains to “the market” and felt
the firm was no longer looking after their interests.
The reason was that communication had been about the firm’s
reasons for the changes, not the benefits to the client.
In another recent case a fund manager raised its percentage rate
of charges claiming it had performed well relative to the
competition although it had not done so in an absolute sense.
This was not taken well by clients and seen as disingenuous and
self-serving.
A Programme for Re-Building Trust
There is a large body of independent research that shows the most
successful, profitable suppliers in all industries are those who
have secured the long-term loyalty of their customers - not just
by delivering outstanding value, but by demonstrating consistent
reliability, understanding of their customers’ needs and a
willingness to put their clients’ interests on a par with their
own.
To do this consistently, one must understand how to measure trust
- not just loyalty, which in a mechanical CRM context can be
another name for inertia.
The first step is to understand how well the organisation stands
on the four dimensions of trust, with clients, introducers and
also with staff. A programme of well-designed research will
enable the firm to produce a diagnosis of the current situation
and suggest realistic goals for taking the firm forward.