Tax
Push For Global Minimum Corporate Tax Rate Hits A Wall

Critics say the idea of an internationally agreed minimum corporate tax rate amounts to a sort of cartel. Defenders argue that it limits the ability of multinationals to arbitrage different countries' tax rules and not pay their "fair share" of tax.
A global push to set a 15 per cent corporate tax floor around the
world – designed to discourage firms from shifting to low-tax
jurisdictions – is hitting a set of obstacles, such as weak
margins for the ruling Democrat Party in Congress and objections
from countries such as Hungary, media reports say.
More than half a year after almost 140 countries agreed to impose
a minimum tax on large companies – a proposal led by US President
Joe Biden – there is little progress on adopting the rules at
national level, the Wall Street Journal noted (June
26). Biden's administration had bid to raise the US
corporate tax rate from its current 21 per cent rate to as much
as 28 per cent. (Under the Trump administration, the corporate
rate was slashed from 35 per cent, when it had been one of the
highest in the developed world.)
The WSJ said Hungary’s decision to withdraw its support
for the minimum tax means that the European Union can’t press
ahead with its plans for 2024 implementation, even though the
bloc’s other 26 members support the move. (Hungary is a EU
member.)
France, one of the most enthusiastic supporters of a minimum
corporate tax, has sought to put pressure on Hungarian Prime
Minister Viktor Orbán about the country’s stance on the
matter.
The idea of a minimum tax rate clashes with the idea that
countries can compete with one another over being low-tax
jurisdictions. Ireland (an EU member) had an 11 per cent
corporate tax rate, attracting businesses such as Amazon. Under
its imputed dividends regime, the Mediterranean island of Malta
(a EU member), has been able to attract corporates with low
actual rates. Defenders of these low rates say that a minimum
rate order amounts to a form of tax “cartel” for the benefit of
high-tax nations.
The matter is relevant for wealth managers and clients
because many high net worth and ultra-HNW individuals have
operating businesses and stakes in large corporates; hence they
would be indirectly affected by a shift to a minimum tax system.
Also, the idea of imposing such a minimum rate could set a
precedent for other taxes. The UK, ironically, agreed to the
minimum corporate rate regime, even though one of the purported
points of it leaving the EU was regaining freedom to set its own
tax rates.