New Products
Opening The Door To Alternative Investments With Securitisation - Breakfast Briefing

Using the technique of securitisation to unlock access to otherwise hard-to-enter investments was the theme of a recent Breakfast Briefing hosted by this news service.
Securitisation is a liberator, a tool to unlock otherwise
hard-to-access returns from areas such as hedge funds and
private equity, a recent Breakfast Briefing event, hosted by the
publisher of this news service, heard. (To see full details
of the event,
click here.)
The quality of a security instrument is ultimately as good or as
weak as the underlying asset upon which it is based; if the
assets are robust, securitisation has a valuable role to play and
can break down certain restrictions, the briefing, held in the
Carlton Club in London’s St James’s district, was told.
Delegates attending the event were told of how holdings of
alternative investments can be used as collateral and
securitised, with the securities listed on an exchange and
thereby eligible to be held in the kind of funds that might
otherwise be off limits for alternative assets because of
liquidity requirements and other tests.
This message was given by Argentarius, a European
firm specialising in creating securitisations where
alternative portfolios are the reference asset. The briefing was
kicked off by Andreas Wölfl, who founded Argentarius Group. In
2004 he set up the group by securitising an offshore hedge fund
into a transferable security; in 2007 he entered the private
label market by creating a securitisation platform in Luxembourg.
Subsequently, the firm has set up headquarters in Malta; the
first exchange traded instrument was listed on the Deutsche Börse
exchange in Frankfurt in 2013.
Besides Wölfl, other speakers were Lorraine Homewood, client
director, Connection Capital; Tim Smith, head of fixed income at
Stamford Associates, and Nick Cowan, managing director of GSX
Limited. The panel was chaired by Margie Lindsay, editor,
Alpha Journal. The event was sponsored by Argentarius.
How it works
Explaining the mechanics, Wölfl said an alternative investment
portfolio, like a private equity fund, is placed into a special
purpose vehicle (SPV); the SPV issues bonds, the performance of
which are linked to the underlying value of the portfolio’s
assets; a securitisation cell company is formed and securities
are linked on a stock exchange, such as Germany’s Deutsche Borse
or Gibraltar’s GSX exchange. The securities, because they are
tradable, are eligible to be held in a passportable retail fund
such as a European UCITS structure. One benefit, for example, is
that a hedge fund domiciled outside the European Union can be
securitised, enabling the former’s investment returns to be made
available to EU clients. At present, regulations such as the EU’s
Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive place limits
on how investment vehicles can be sold to EU investors by non-EU
firms. Securitisation not only unlocks the door but simplifies
the process.
One issue is that under certain rules, banks cannot act as
custodians for non-bank assets but securitisation “can help them
fulfil these [custodian requirements]”, Wölfl said. He also gave
the case of a US manager of a Cayman Islands-based fund who
wanted to tap EU investors – the securitisation option enables
this to happen. Securitisation is a “different kind of feeder
fund”, Wölfl said.
During the discussion, Stamford Associates’ Smith said that
securitisation “is all about risk transfer” and stressed that any
evaluation of securities must be based upon clear information
about the assets in a portfolio and the visibility and
reliability of cash flows from those assets. He said
securitisation has been given a bad name in some quarters,
arguing that the kind of securitisation based on a single,
transparent set of assets is very different from the
multi-layered mix of strong, moderate-risk and high-risk assets
seen in structures such as collateralised debt obligations that
suffered massive losses from the US sub-prime mortgage
debacle.
Wölfl noted that a recent problem for many small and medium sized
enterprises (SMEs) has been lack of access to bank credit for
routine short-term credit facilities; securitisation creates new
access to credit, he said.
Connection Capital’s Homewood said the issue of transparency of
securitisations is “absolutely paramount” for investors, who will
want to see full disclosure on fee structures and costs. One
concern people have had about certain forms of alternative
investment, she said, is that they “don’t want to be held in
structures for years and want more flexibility”; she said
securitisation offers a more flexible way to play
alternative asset classes.
Cowan said the GSX sets clear requirements around transparency of
securities listed on it; “we are very interested in the
underlying risks and in transparency and we want to be sure we
get to the heart of a risk,” he said.
Asked why wealth managers would be interested in such
securitisation, Smith said it opens market areas that are tough
to enter. He gave the example of the leveraged loans market, one
which is typically only accessible by professional investors and
specialists, not private clients. “This is a very stable asset
class in terms of generating income,” he continued. Given
their characteristic of uneven liquidity, leveraged
loans can’t be held currently in a UCITS fund, but securitisation
would open the way, he said.
On the risks side, Smith said a key requirement is for advisors
and managers to closely monitor the quality of the assets
underpinning securities.
GSX’s Cowan was asked if Gibraltar has capacity to list such
securities, and he responded with an emphatic “yes”. “Before
Argentarius [listed a security] Gibraltar had not listed an
exchange traded instrument before.”
Homewood said she does not see such securities being particularly
strong in a retail market because “many investors won’t yet
understand a lot of these transactions...these are more for
sophisticated investors who understand what they are buying.”
Wölfl added that at a time when about half of German government
bonds [aka bunds] are suffering negative yields, a thirst for
returns meant that a market for securities able to tap
higher-yielding assets will be very attractive.
Stamford’s Smith added: “Remember, what you are buying here is a
set of underlying cashflows.”