Financial Results
Miton Sees AuM Soar Following PSigma Acquisition

UK-quoted fund management firm Miton Group has reported a jump in assets under management of 73.5 per cent to £3 billion ($4.9 billion) in 2013, up from £1.8 billion in 2012, following its acquisition of PSigma.
UK-quoted fund management firm Miton Group has reported a jump
in assets under management of 73.5 per cent to £3 billion ($4.9
billion) for 2013, up from £1.8 billion in 2012, following its
acquisition of PSigma.
The firm said in a statement that adjusted profit before tax rose
20.5 per cent to £4.7 million, while net revenue increased 29.4
per cent to £15 million. Administrative costs, including
share-based payments, increased by 33 per cent in 2013.
Profit before tax fell 22.2 per cent to £700,000, down from
£900,000 in 2012. This includes exceptional operating expenses of
£1 million relating to the PSigma acquisition and consequent
group restructuring, Miton said.
The acquisition of PSigma brought in £749 million in assets under
management, while Miton saw organic growth of £351 million in
funds and investment trusts.
The firm said that the sale of the Liverpool fund business
announced earlier this year was expected to be completed on 31
March.
“Over the past three years the group has decisively scaled
up for growth with some of the most highly-regarded people in the
industry joining the group. 2013 saw a step up in interest in our
‘Beyond the credit boom’ investment strategies which delivered
significant organic growth,” said executive chairman Ian
Dighé.
“As at 28 February 2014, total AuM stood at £3.2 billion. We have
made a good start to 2014 and therefore look forward to a year of
further progress,” he added.
In January, Miton Group said that it is selling its Liverpool
fund management business to Seneca Investment Managers for £6.4
million. Seneca will pay £3.5 million on completion of the deal,
plus around £1.9 million for net assets and a potential deferred
payment of up to £1 million.
Miton said that following a detailed review of the Liverpool
business, it had concluded that despite recent growth, there was
less prospect of rapid growth of its assets under management
compared with other parts of the group.