Banking Crisis
MAS Tells Singapore-Based Banks How To Prepare For The Worst

The Monetary Authority of Singapore has set out new plans on how it wants banks operating in the city-state to have sufficient liquidity to cope with market blowups.
Singapore’s monetary regulator has set out updated rules on how
banks operating in the city-state must keep liquid assets aside
to deal with market blowups. New rules start coming into force
next January.
Lim Hng Kiang, deputy chairman of the Monetary
Authority of Singapore, set out a new approach by the
regulator to banking at a time when, even over five years after
arguably the worst financial crisis since the 1930s, concerns
remain about vulnerability of banks to shocks, such as a sharp
setback in property markets. The MAS has previously warned about
how banks could be vulnerable to problems in the real estate
market – hence why authorities there have also been trying to
cool red-hot property prices.
New rules apply to banks that have a significant retail presence
in Singapore. This means “domestic systemically important banks”,
which the MAS proposes to “regard a bank as having a significant
retail presence if its market share of resident non-bank deposits
is 3 per cent or more, and if it has 150,000 or more depositors
with accounts less than or equal to S$250,000”.
Locally-incorporated D-SIBs will continue to hold 2 percentage
points of capital above the international Basel III regulatory
minimum, he continued.
Such banks, he said, must have “well-developed recovery and
resolution plans” – a process sometimes referred to in the
regulatory world as “living wills”. The issue of how banks can be
restructured or wound up in an orderly manner, and minimise
stress to the broader economy, proved to be one of the biggest
headaches for policymakers in 2008, amid fears that some banks
were so large that they had to be rescued with taxpayers’ money,
rather than allowed to collapse.
The three local Singapore banks, for the purpose of the
regulatory structure, are DBS, Oversea-Chinese
Banking Corp and United Overseas
Bank.
Liquidity
The MAS deputy chairman also set out new rules on liquidity.
Under the existing MAS’ minimum liquid assets requirement,
lenders must have sufficient eligible assets to cover a specified
share of qualifying liabilities, in case there is a sudden demand
for cash – as was the case in 2008. In 2008, the Singapore
regulator moved from a “single headline MLA ratio for all banks
to one more attuned to specific circumstances of a bank". Last
year, the MAS set out a range of risk management principles to
guide banks further on how to deal with liquidity issues.
The new “Liquidity Coverage Ratio” is a standard that takes
its lead from the Basel III international banking standards. The
LCR tries to ensure that banks hold sufficient high quality
liquid assets to match their total net cash outflows over a
30-day period.
The regulator said the LCR is more “risk-sensitive” than the
MLA.
“Whereas the MLA is based on balance sheet liabilities at a
single point in time, the LCR calibrates liquidity requirements
based on expected net outflows over a 30-day stress period. The
LCR requirement takes into account the experience of banks
globally during stress scenarios and better aligns regulatory
requirements with the actual liquidity risks that banks may
face,” he said.
Foreign banks, currency requirements
Lim Hng Kiang said foreign banks in Singapore will continue to be
subject to MAS’ liquidity requirements. He noted that many such
banks in Singapore operate under a universal banking model, and
several are funding centres for related entities in Singapore or
other affiliates within their groups. This situation carries
certain risks, however. This means that “while MAS recognises
that there may be cost efficiencies in managing liquidity
centrally at the group level, there can be significant obstacles
to the free movement of liquidity across borders during a stress
scenario. Thus, foreign banks operating in Singapore will be
required to maintain some liquid assets in Singapore to support
their local liquidity needs”, he said.
Also, the new liquidity framework will apply to all currencies;
at present the minimum liquid assets requirement applies only to
Singapore dollar-qualifying liabilities. Going forward, this will
apply to all currencies with the aim of making sure banks manage
their forex risks appropriately. Foreign banks must have a
Singapore dollar liquidity coverage ratio of 100 per cent – they
will need, in an emergency, to have enough liquid assets to cover
cashflows during 30 days of turmoil.
OCBC already complies with the liquidity framework for 2015 and
DBS is “comfortable” with the requirements as they’re in line
with Basel III rules, the banks said, according to Bloomberg. It
did not mention UOB’s position.
Turning to the broader economy, the regulator added: “The global
economy continues to recover. Economic activity in the US
has rebounded from a weak start, and is expected to pick up pace
in the second half of 2014. The eurozone and Japan should post
modest growth for the year as a whole, supported by highly
accommodative monetary policies. The upturn in the advanced
economies bodes well for Asia. In China, the authorities
are addressing financial vulnerabilities even while attempting to
restructure the economy for longer-term growth. The
decisive election result in India has raised high hopes for an
investment-led turnaround in the economy. Barring shocks,
the Singapore economy can be expected to grow by 2-4 per cent in
2014.”
“On the financial front, an uneasy calm seems to have settled in
markets but we remain in uncharted waters as the US proceeds to
unwind its unprecedented monetary stimulus. Banks and regulators
must still be vigilant against obvious and hidden risks, and be
prepared for bumps on the road to global interest rate
normalisation, he said.