Banking Crisis
Large US Banks Need More Capital Buffers – Federal Reserve

Blowups at a number of banks this year revived memories of the 2008 financial crash and the need for lenders to have sufficient "buffer capital" to ride market storms. When HNW individuals contemplate their accounts, the financial strength of an institution has come right back to the top of the agenda.
The US Federal Reserve’s regulatory chief said he has decided to
strengthen financial cushions for larger banks, moves he said
will make the system more robust following failures at mid-sized
lenders such as Silicon Valley
Bank and First Republic
Bank this year, a report said.
According to prepared comments yesterday, Michael Barr, vice
chair for supervision, was quoted by the Wall Street
Journal as saying: “Events over the past few months have
only reinforced the need for humility and skepticism, and for an
approach that makes banks resilient to both familiar and
unanticipated risks.”
The demise of these banks – later put into the arms of the
Federal Deposit Insurance Commission and then bought by other
banks – rattled markets. (See stories here
and here.) They
revived memories of the 2008 crash and how it focused attention
on the risk controls and balance sheet strength of banks. Within
the wealth management sector, firms have told Family Wealth
Report that it has prompted HNW clients to reconsider
their banking arrangements and diversify their accounts. The same
message has been relayed in other countries, from Switzerland to
Singapore.
According to the Fed’s proposed plans, due to be issued later
this year, the largest banks could be required to hold an
additional 2 percentage points of capital, or an additional $2 of
capital for every $100 of risk-weighted assets, Barr was quoted
as saying.
The precise amount of additional capital will depend on a firm’s
business activities, with the biggest increases expected to be
reserved for the largest, most complex US megabanks, Barr
said.
The SVB collapse focused attention on the way banks, flush
with deposits, bought government bonds and managed their market
exposures without, so it was argued, being prepared for rising
interest rates. (See an
analysis of SVB here.) The SVB saga in particular also
highlighted the plight of the tech sector that benefited from
more than a decade of ultra-low interest rates, and must now
adapt to rising rates.