Strategy
INTERVIEW: When Clients' Cognitive Abilities Decline - Julius Baer's Programme

The private bank’s London chief has embraced and committed to helping customers with potential or actual cognitive impairment, adding training in this area to its vulnerable customers policy.
The words “trusted advisor” get thrown around a good deal in the
wealth management industry and few issues underline the need to
build robust relationships more than what happens when a client’s
cognitive abilities decline.
As populations in developed nations live longer, diseases of old
age, such as Alzheimer’s and dementia, take a toll. According to
the Alzheimer’s Society, there are 850,000 people with dementia
living in the UK, with numbers set to rise to over 1 million by
2025, and soar to 2 million by 2051. That figure may only
describe part of a larger problem. At the same time, regulators
have made a big point about ensuring that clients’ investments
and services are “suitable” for their needs - and clearly mental
capacity is a significant issue.
Step forward Julius Baer, the Swiss private bank, which has
started a programme to train all its client-facing staff in how
to flag up if they see signs that clients’ cognitive abilities
are declining, affecting the ability to absorb information and
act on it. More than 100 managers have already gone through
training programmes under the leadership of David Durlacher,
chief executive of Julius Baer in London, and the guidance of Dr
James Warner, a medical director at Red & Yellow Care, a
consultant old age psychiatrist at CNWL Foundation Trust and
honorary reader in psychiatry at Imperial College London. Dr
Warner has already worked with law firms and other organisations
wrestling with this issue and adapted the model to fit
Julius Baer’s own aspirations.
“He put this training model in place in a few other large law
firms who had clearly recognised the obligations under the Mental
Capacity Act, but he had not found others in the wealth
management area who had done the same,” Durlacher told this
publication recently.
“We as an industry have talked a lot about suitability over the
years, but I’ve not heard much from the top talking vulnerability
in terms of someone’s ability to understand information, to
retain, and use it. The FCA [Financial Conduct Authority] has,
though,” he said.
Legislation and regulation
Indeed, the FCA has and continues to take action over
suitability. A number of firms have been reprimanded, including
AXA Wealth, which was fined over £1.8 million ($2.19 million) in
2013 for suitability failures. These failures were widespread
across AXA’s sales process for investment products and
potentially affected a large number of customers, including
investors, who were inexperienced or may have been vulnerable.
Santander was fined more than £12 million in 2014 for failings in
its provision of investment advice after an examination in 2012.
These failures included the failure to address vulnerability and
age. The FCA in 2015 said some firms – which it did not name –
were falling short in terms of suitability of investment advice.
There have been similar concerns flagged in the US and this is
far from being a UK-only issue.
The UK regulator released an occasional paper on vulnerable
customers in February 2015, a discussion paper on the ageing
population and financial services in February 2016, and is
continuing to do work in this area.
“For normal age-related cognitive change or mild cognitive
impairment, financial services providers need to make sure their
systems and staff are attuned to recognise the situation and make
appropriate service adjustments,” the discussion paper said.
“Staff on the frontline do not need to be experts, but they need
sufficient training to facilitate a proper conversation, to know
where internal expertise lies, and know how and when to refer
on,” the occasional paper said.
At Julius Baer, Durlacher said that while his staff do not
have the training of medical professionals, he has ensured that
the programme trains them to fulfil their responsibilities under
the 2005 Mental Capacity Act.
“Can our clients, or the people who we speak with, understand
information that’s relevant to them? Can they retain that
information for a reasonable period of time? And can they use or
weigh up that information to then be able to make a decision?
These are some of the founding elements of the Act, and if we
don’t start becoming sensitive to changes in those three main
tests, then we are missing a trick,” he said.
Richard Norridge, partner at international law firm Herbert Smith
Freehills, has acted for clients on both sides of the fence in
numerous cases involving cognitive decline. He notes particularly
the sensitivity of the issue, and how much the urgency of
understanding it has increased in an era of a rapidly increasing
life expectancy.
“We don’t always like to see mental decline in people we know
well and like. The stigma behind cognitive decline can sometimes
prevent professionals from having conversations with their client
because of the fear of the client taking exception or offence to
the topic being raised. But, if firms and advisors do not address
this, they are taking risks. In addition to the possibility of
civil claims and significant reputational risks, regulators
increasingly expect them to be sophisticated in relation to these
issues,” Norridge told this publication.
Norridge explains some of the risks, warning signs and key issues
he has seen in this area including:
- Asset managers rarely or never meet the principal
client, dealing with them through representatives, not being
able to ascertain if they may be suffering from cognitive
decline;
- Courts say that capacity is "time and task specific".
Though an individual can be brilliant at – and mentally capable
of – making investment decisions, this does not mean that they
are mentally capable for all purposes. For example, there
are reported cases of people being commercially successful whilst
suffering from paranoid delusions about the people around
them;
- Red flags include where clients suddenly make different
and out of character investment decisions. This could simply be
due to a change in life circumstances, but can also be one of the
red flags for cognitive decline; and
- Some clients may be well adept at social veneer: giving
the appearance of understanding whilst not in fact doing so,
which can mask cognitive issues.
“Spotting the signs, asking the right questions, having the right
conversations and getting the right professionals involved where
necessary is crucial to helping clients who may be suffering from
cognitive decline,” he said.
Power of attorney
Understanding power of attorney issues is also a key concern with
which firms must engage. According to a poll carried out by
the Alzheimer’s Society among people with dementia, their
carers and their family and friends, only 22 per cent feel that
businesses and organisations understand people’s rights around
lasting powers of attorney.
Age UK notes that ongoing work is needed to ensure that all staff
and branches are made aware of the legal rights attaching to
powers of attorney and have a consistent system for helping
customers use them - including procedures that take account of
the practical challenges faced by carers and dependents when
trying to comply with systems of identification and
verification.
Hearts and minds
One of the foundations of any such training, while also
understanding the technical aspects of such situations, is to
have a sense of understanding of what the client is going
through; to be able to engage and communicate in the personable
way that many advisors pride themselves on when dealing with
clients.
Rachel Mortimer is the founder and CEO of Engage & Create, a
social enterprise dedicated to transforming the quality of life
for people living with dementia. She has helped financial
services organisations, including the FCA, understand the lived
experience of ageing and cognitive impairment.
One of her training programmes, “the dementia experience”, uses a
soundtrack and specially designed tasks to simulate the confusion
and disorientation reported by people with dementia.
“The kit combined with the challenge of completing everyday tasks
enables participants to experience for themselves the physical
and mental challenges those with dementia face, and use the
experience to provide better services and products,” Mortimer
said.
“By gaining a deeper knowledge of the lived experience of older
customers and those living with cognitive decline, financial
services firms will be better placed to apply technology, best
practices and more thoughtful communication to help detect and
manage any issues and vulnerabilities for customers, aiding fraud
prevention whilst becoming a more attractive service to this
growing market,” she added.
Needless to say, the issue is a global one. For example, in
November 2015, research in the US by Fidelity, the investments
giant, found that three-quarters of financial advisors are
working with clients with diminished mental capacity, while one
in five advisors has encountered financial abuse among their
ageing clients. Another by Cerulli Associates showed that ageing
client bases will create challenges for advisors, as 57 per cent
of their clients are above the age of 60 (while the summary did
not specifically cite cognitive impairment, it is fair to
anticipate that this would likely be among the list of related
issues).
Durlacher is already noting the positives of engaging his company
in such training, explaining how following the training,
employees were able to spot a non-elderly client showing symptoms
of cognitive decline.
“It had actually been very imperceptible, but the relationship
manager flagged it up to the management team, who was then able
to have that discussion with the client. The client went to seek
help and cognitive decline was in fact discovered,” he said.
“Cognitive decline is no respecter of age, it is not necessarily
just associated with dementia and it is not necessarily a
long-term progressive situation,” he added.
Not just window dressing
Durlacher is firm in his view that this initiative is not just a
flash in the pan for Julius Baer, but a part of its culture, and
that the firm is committed to training people in this area on an
ongoing basis.
“This isn’t just a one-off nice-to-have programme. This is about
change in the way we care for our clients, and as new people come
on board, I hope that they will see in Julius Baer, a working
environment that really does genuinely put that into action. That
we do care for the people that we are there to serve, and we care
for each other as employees,” said Durlacher.