The power of the brand is such a cliche that its essential truth in certain walks of life can be overlooked. Brands matter in the fortunes of the hedge fund world, so wealth managers should take note, this article claims.

As wealth management professionals know only too well, the $3 trillion hedge fund industry hasn’t had an easy time of late. Fees are under pressure and last year saw strong liquidations. More of these funds were liquidated in the final three months of 2016 than in previous quarters, making last year the heaviest year for shutdowns since the financial crisis year of 2008. According to Hedge Fund Research, the Chicago-headquartered organization, liquidations increased to 275 in the quarter, rising from 252 in the prior quarter, though falling from the 305 funds liquidated in the same quarter of 2015. For the full year of 2016, liquidations totaled 1,057, surpassing the 1,023 liquidations from 2009, though falling well short of the record of 1,471 liquidations from 2008. 

These figures don’t make for comfortable reading, although that doesn’t perhaps justify gloom. What does appear to be the case is that those funds with the most recognizable names seem to be faring relatively well. So how does marketing and branding fit into the picture? And what should wealth managers think about brands? Should they operate with a degree of scepticism about all this and not be dazzled by brands if better, less well-known firms are out seeking business? 

In this article, Donald Steinbrugge, CFA, managing partner of Agecroft Partners, in Richmond, VA, gives some views. The editors of this news service are pleased to share these views and invite readers to respond. Email the editor at tom.burroughes@wealthbriefing.com 

Since the market correction of 2008, a vast majority of hedge fund net asset flows have gone to a small minority of hedge funds with the strongest brands. A recent report from Hedge Fund Research shows that approximately 69 per cent of hedge fund assets are controlled by firms with over $5 billion in assets under management and 91% are controlled by firms with over $1 billion in assets. This is a significant increase from the 2009 percentages of 61 per cent and 86 per cent respectively. 

Each year many hedge fund investors are inundated with thousands of emails and phone calls from managers requesting a meeting. To filter through the overload of information, investors are turning more and more to a firm’s brand when choosing which funds to meet and ultimately invest with.

However, having a strong brand is not limited to just the largest managers. For example, many investors will allocate to start-up firms that spun-out of other high profile organizations, despite the fact they have no audited track record. In reality, a strong brand is even more important for hedge funds with less than $250 million in AuM. Despite the fact that these managers represent a vast majority of the approximately 15,000 hedge funds, they only represent 2.94 per cent of assets.

A brand is an investor’s perception of the overall quality of a hedge fund based on multiple evaluation factors that evolve over time. A high-quality brand takes a long time to develop, but once achieved, it significantly enhances a firm’s ability to raise capital and retain assets during a drawdown in performance. Over time, we believe the trend concentrating a higher percentage of assets in the largest managers will reverse. We expect this to happen due to increased sophistication of institutional investors, poor recent performance of many of the largest, well known hedge funds, the pressure institutional investors are receiving to enhance returns, and the belief that smaller, more nimble managers have an advantage in a performance environment increasingly dependent on security selection. This is especially true for small managers operating in less efficient markets or capacity constrained strategies.

For the small number of new hedge fund launches that are successful each year, their high-quality brand was typically created at their previous firm. This may include having held a senior position at another top-quality brand hedge fund, having spun out of a top investment bank proprietary trading desk, or having been seeded by a well-known investor.

For the hedge funds not fortunate enough to launch with such fanfare, the key question is, what are the firms that have developed the strongest brands doing differently?

There are three critical issues to consider in creating a strong brand and raising assets in today’s competitive environment: the quality of the fund offering, the investor’s perception of the quality of the fund offering, and the marketing and sales strategy.

The first step in the process is having a high quality product offering. Based on Agecroft Partners’ hedge fund research process which considers thousands of hedge funds each year based on multiple evaluation criteria, 85 per cent to 90 per cent of hedge funds are not very good. With over 15,000 hedge funds to choose from, it is almost impossible for these sub-par managers to raise assets from investors outside of friends and family.

The biggest mistake most of these lower-quality hedge funds make is not understanding the evaluation factors investors utilize to select hedge funds and therefore not creating a top-quality offering. These typically include an evaluation of a firm’s operational infrastructure, investment team and their pedigree, investment process focused on an inefficiency in the capital markets and their differential advantages to capture this inefficiency, risk controls, performance, service providers and fund terms. A weakness in any of these factors can eliminate a firm from consideration.

The marketplace is highly competitive and hedge fund investors use a process of elimination in selecting hedge funds. This typically begins by screening the thousands of hedge funds in the market place, meeting with a couple hundred and hiring a select few each year. In some cases a minor adjustment can significantly improve the marketability of the fund. Hedge fund performance tends to be the initial screen which eliminates a majority of managers, but once performance has reached a certain hurdle its weighting in the evaluation process is less important than most managers realize.

The second step in the process of building a strong brand is making sure the market’s perception of the firm is equal to reality. This requires a consistently delivered, concise and linear marketing message that identifies the differential advantages across each of the evaluation factors investors use to select hedge funds. Many high quality hedge funds have difficulty raising assets because they do a poor job of articulating their message to the marketplace and their strengths are underappreciated or unnoticed. Unfortunately, it often takes only one poorly worded answer to get a firm eliminated from consideration.

It is important that the marketing message is clearly understood and articulated by all employees of the hedge fund. The message should be consistently integrated throughout all the firm’s communications including the website, oral presentations, written materials, due diligence questionnaires and quarterly letters. A well-prepared and accurate marketing presentation creates a consistency that builds confidence in potential investors.

The final step in building a strong brand is implementing a highly-focused marketing and sales strategy that broadly penetrates the marketplace while being compliant with regulatory guidelines. The hedge fund investor marketplace is highly inter-connected. Many investors exchange ideas on managers through both formal and, most often, informal channels. The hedge fund investor marketplace is highly inter-connected investors exchange ideas on managers through both formal and, most often, informal channels.  

As a result, the more deeply a manager penetrates the marketplace the stronger their brand will become. Building a strong brand and raising assets takes time and cannot be rushed. The hedge fund industry is not transaction oriented. In many instances, being too aggressive will eliminate a firm from the selection process. A majority investors require a minimum of three or four meetings with a fund before they will invest.

One way to accelerate the process is to utilize a well-seasoned, highly respected internal sales team, top-tier third party marketing firm or a combination of both. Experienced and well-thought of salespeople often have a reputation or brand in the marketplace themselves and can have a large impact on a hedge fund’s success in growing their asset base. If their brand is strong, it can add credibility and significantly increase the likelihood of meeting with an investor. 

Prime broker capital introduction teams can also be a valuable resource to introduce a firm to investors through their conferences or other activities. However, their activity is limited by regulation and should not be relied upon solely. As mentioned before, it usually takes multiple meetings for an investor to conclude their assessment and it is very important to have multiple people maintain a consistent focus on the sales process.

It is well known that strong performance alone will not attract assets. The firms that will be successful in growing their business are ones that stay highly focused on providing a top-quality offering, clearly articulate their firm’s differential advantages and have a highly professional sales and marketing strategy that deeply penetrates the market place.