Legal
Family Court Statistics – A True Reflection?

The author examines different trends within family law, such as the number of divorce cases, the uses of pre- and post-nuptial agreements, the development of arbitration, and more.
The data gathered by family courts is important reference
material for private client lawyers handling clients’ family
issues, which often feature in these pages given the implications
for wealth. How well, or not, do the statistics capture what is
happening in family law, and, if there are problems, what can be
done?
To explain this topic is Charmaine Hast, a consultant in the
family team of Collyer
Bristow. (More on Hast below the article.) The editors
of this publication are pleased to share such insights; the usual
editorial disclaimers apply. Email tom.burroughes@wealthbriefing.com
and amanda.cheesley@clearviewpublishing.com
Interestingly, when statistics are published which, among other
things, reflect an increase by 2 per cent in domestic violence
applications and the number of orders made decreased by less than
1 per cent, various questions arise. When divorce cases drop
by 1 per cent and continue to fall from the peak seen in
2022 further questions arise. However, the same statistics show
that from October to December 2024 there were increases in
financial remedy and domestic violence applications.
What the public may not be aware of is that in the court system
financial applications would have taken 45 weeks for proceedings
to be completed; there are, of course, quicker and less
expensive alternatives. As an arbitrator (CIArb), I have
experienced financial applications which, with sensible
directions, result in a binding judgment by an arbitrator,
even in complex matters, within about half the time.
It is not unknown for a final settlement to be reached in 30
weeks. The additional cost of an arbitrator is easily justified
in less time being spent on the two sets of solicitors who are
bound to comply with an exacting timetable. The ADR process where
parties proceed to a private Financial Dispute Resolution has
also seen a huge percentage of matters settled, outside the
public eye.
Over the years, the family law arena has weathered the
decrease in heterosexual divorces, the addition of same sex
divorces, peppered with the requirement for pre- and post-nuptial
agreements and even cohabitation agreements. These were not the
order of the day prior to the case of Granatino v Radmacher in
2010.
The public has always operated under the misapprehension
that there are “common law marriages” – there are not – and
that pre- and post-nuptial agreements are not binding. Pre- and
post-nuptial agreements carry weight with our courts if they are
properly executed and, most importantly, “fair.” Unlike [the
time] when mediation raised its head in the family law arena, and
many dipped their toe into the mediation pool – aiming
to try to please both parties, which in many cases was being
guided by a non-family lawyer – pre-nuptial agreements
are another beast altogether.
The latest statistics show a decrease in marriages and therefore
a decrease in divorces and perhaps, if more people knew about the
weight of pre-nuptial agreements, this statistic would be
different from that which has recently been published.
There are rightly many family lawyers who do not
undertake drafting pre- and post-nuptial agreements because
the word “fair” is a hurdle. The certificate which
solicitors and barristers attach to pre-nuptial agreements as
evidence that each party has received independent legal advice,
obviously does not reflect the advice given. However, the advice
which must be given is whether in the view of the legal
practitioner, the pre- or post-nuptial agreement will carry
weight.
Regrettably, this is where one separates the men from the boys.
There are many family practitioners who are excellent at the
fact-finding mission of ascertaining assets and sourcing the
correct value of those assets. Many practitioners however do not
have the inclination to then commit to what is
“fair.”
Many would say that in England and Wales where the present
government is seemingly introducing fiscal obligations, including
a burden on private pensions, marriage is one option which
provides mitigation for families. The reluctance to marry, which
would change the curve of the present statistics, would no doubt
dissipate if the public knew that pre-nuptial agreements are
worth the time, effort and money required to put a valid contract
in place.
Understandably there are many who will not embark upon the
task of drafting these documents and, more importantly, how often
are pre- and post-nuptial agreements reviewed. There is no doubt
that many agreements which will now, despite the increase in the
attractiveness of these contracts in the last 15 years, carry no
weight whatsoever. One also wonders whether this will open the
flood gates to pre- and post-nuptial agreements being used
not only by the rich and famous, but by the man or woman in the
street. The costs of these documents are not unsubstantial but
with the effluxion of time, these contracts should provide
protection for a family’s ever-increasing asset position as they
go through life, with a natural inclination for
“more.”
I can recall many years ago being interviewed on national TV and
debating with the editor of a national newspaper, why the man or
woman in the street, who is not “rich and famous” should
seriously consider this course of action for financial
protection. This, in my view, is one way of taking a possible
spoke out of the wheel by trying to give more longevity to
marriages which deserve not to have “money” as the problem.
In conclusion, perhaps the question must be asked as to whether
the Chancellor’s disliked tax provisions are in fact promoting
marriage even for the anti-marriage brigade.
About the author
Charmaine Hast is a highly-regarded name in family law with
experience and expertise in advising on complex, high-value and
high-profile family matters, often with a cross-border element.
She has represented a significant number of public figures
including pop stars, actors and actresses, members of parliament,
well known sportspeople, TV personalities, and entrepreneurs.
She is a member of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and, as
one of only a small number of Family Solicitor finance
Arbitrators (CIArb), can hand down binding judgments in family
law financial matters. Hast has a degree in psychology as well as
law and is highly skilled at negotiating extremely favourable
settlements and securing exceptional judgments for clients. She
is also a qualified South African Attorney and has several
reported cases, including The Supreme Court.
Among other accomplishments, Hast established the Family
department at Wedlake Bell in 2011 and previously established and
headed the Family team of South-East firm, TWM Solicitors. She is
a member of Resolution (formerly Solicitors Family Law
Association) where she was one of the first accredited
specialists in high net worth financial matters and child
abductions.