Investment Strategies
EXCLUSIVE: Europe Is Out Of The Emergency Room - Worries Still Linger - Summit

Europe’s economy and financial markets are out of immediate danger but worries linger, hence a degree of caution is justified, a conference hosted by this publication heard recently.
Is Europe’s economy and financial market now well and truly out
of the accident and emergency room? Up to a point, the answer is
“yes”, but the men and women in white coats are still hovering
nearby in case of a relapse, a conference has heard.
At the WealthBriefing London Summit 2014, panellists at a session
entitled, The Outlook For European Equities, wrestled with just
how far European markets have recovered from the 2008-2009 market
crash and subsequent period when it sometimes appeared that the
eurozone might implode.
In particular, while some of the market recovery might have been
fuelled by the sort of emergency monetary policy steps taken by
the European Central Bank, and the fact that European stocks
looked dirt cheap after the selloff, other sources of sustainable
progress are now needed to propel prices further, panellists
said.
“We’ve travelled quite a long way in Europe and two years’ ago
there seemed just no hope for the region,” Robert Jones, co-head
of European equities at Union Bancaire Privée, told delegates at
the event, held at America Square, in London’s City financial
district.
“After a few good years…..investors are now questioning whether
we can see any real follow-through in terms of [corporate]
earnings,” he said.
Other panellists were Kevin Lilley, fund manager, European
equities, at Old Mutual Global Investors, and David Moss, head of
European equities, F&C Investments. Sponsors of the
conference were Advent; Appway; Platform Securities; smartKYC;
Equipos (now part of SimCorp); BITA Risk; Portcullis Trust
(Singapore) Ltd; Dion Financial Solutions; Union Bancaire Privée;
WDX, and Wealthmonitor.
Negative real rates
ECB moves on rates and stimuli for bank lending, announced in
early June, were a welcome opportunity for policymakers to “buy
time” in the hope that economic growth gets some self-sustaining
momentum, according to the speakers. (Among other measures, the
central bank cut its deposit rate for banks from zero to -0.1 per
cent, to encourage banks to lend to businesses rather than hold
on to money. The ECB also cut its benchmark interest rate to 0.15
per cent from 0.25 per cent.)
“This is the first year in three years when the eurozone has seen
a full recovery. I think [stock market] valuations are reasonable
at this stage of the cycle,” said Lilley.
The move by the ECB reinforces “investors’ minds that the ECB is
aware of the issues”, said Moss. He noted that Europe is, in
contrast to some degree with the UK and North America, more
reliant on bank lending for corporate financing. As a result, any
action taken to encourage more bank lending is welcome, he
said.
One of the reasons for the European Central Bank’s move to loosen
monetary policy yet further is to prevent the euro-dollar
exchange rate rising to the point where all-important export
earnings are hit, Lilley said. “European earnings have been
hampered by currency issues,” he said.
Ukraine and other worries
Asked how to treat geopolitical conflicts when running
portfolios, UBP’s Jones said it is very difficult to weigh as a
risk factor, other than to note that there will be some sort of
negative effect, such as disruptions to energy supplies.
Asked how to treat geopolitical conflicts when running
portfolios, UBP’s Jones said it is very difficult to weigh as a
risk factor, other than to note that there could be some sort of
negative effect, such as disruptions to energy supplies.
Lilley said that his firm entered 2014 with exposure to Russia
and Eastern Europe, doing so by holding the shares of Western
European nations with significant earnings streams from these
regions. “When this [Ukraine] situation started to kick off, we
sold all those positions,” Lilley said. “I don’t know what the
end-game is going to be but we decided to sit that one out.”
Moss said the Ukraine/Russia saga reminded investors of the risks
in emerging markets, although in the longer term, he sees them as
places where plenty of strong returns can be earned. However, it
is also a reminder not to lump emerging markets into a single
bracket but realise the considerable variety. He cited the issue
of China’s transition, sometimes painful, from an export-driven
economy to a more domestically-orientated one.
Financials and litigation risk
The panellists were asked about sectors they might favour, such
as banks. Lilley said that once European policymakers have
completed their asset quality review later in 2014, it should see
banks resume their lending activity after being on hold pending
the review’s result.
Moss said he has been overweight European banks for “a few
years”. “We think there are several banks that are, and were,
good quality,” he said.
UBP’s Jones flagged one risk for investors in European banks as
that of continued litigation from the US, not just over tax, but
due to other issues (he did not mention specific banks by
name).
Herd mentality
During the question-and-answer session, the panellists were asked
if there is a danger of investment firms and banks reaching a
stifling consensus over how to manage money. Jones replied that
there is a “degree of herd mentality among investors….but if you
look at portfolios there are also some big differences”.
Lilley said there are signs, in terms of rising M&A activity
in some regions, that cash-rich companies want to put money to
work; UBP’s Jones cited Deloitte research suggesting a slow rise
in desire by firms to increase capex.
“When M&A announcements are being made at the moment, share
prices on both sides [buyer and seller] are going up, which shows
that investors are rewarding it,” he said, noting that in some
conditions, the share price of the bidding firm typically falls,
while the opposite firm’s share price tends to rise.