Trust Estate
Debating Privacy, Trusts And Brexit At Swiss, Liechtenstein STEP Conference

The third annual conference of the Swiss and Liechtenstein STEP Federation tackled issues ranging from assaults on financial privacy to whether crypto-currencies could or should be held in trusts.
Financial privacy remains threatened even while the pendulum
might have swung back in favour of more respect for clients’
affairs, a Swiss conference held by the trusts and estate
planning sector recently heard.
Practitioners must be alert to how clients’ financial lives are
in the spotlight even when genuine public interest does not
require it. Demand for publicly available data on beneficial
ownership has been at odds in some ways with the recent
introduction of European data protection rules, reinforced by
worries linked to massive cyber-security breaches, the event,
held in Interlaken earlier in January, heard.
Privacy, regulation, the state of the “golden visa” market,
crypto-currencies and the impact of Brexit were among the topics
aired at the Swiss &
Liechtenstein STEP Federation Alpine conference. More than
240 delegates – a record – gathered at the Congress Centre
Kursaal Interlaken for the two-day conference. The event kicked
off with a moving address on issues concerning poverty, civil
conflict and aid work from Elhadj As Sy, Secretary General of the
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent
Societies.
Financial privacy is a human right, as enshrined in declarations
and treaties, but everywhere it is under assault, David Russell,
QC, deputy chair, STEP worldwide, and senior barrister, said in
opening comments. He repeated those comments in the first panel
discussion. “One should ask the question – who’s watching the
watchers?”
Fellow panelists in the first session were Count Francis von
Seilern-Aspang, managing director of Industrie- und Finanzkontor
Ets, a privately owned trust company with a specific tradition
and expertise in the long-term and trans-generational
preservation of wealth, and Filippo Noseda, partner at Mishcon de
Reya. Noseda reiterated his sharp critique of the Common
Reporting Standard system under which governments exchange client
data, warning about the lack of protection for legitimate
information in certain jurisdictions. He said that millions of
account transfers under some transfers were like the
cyber-security breaches of recent times. Von Seilern-Aspang said
the trust industry must argue strongly for the legitimacy of
privacy and a prudent approach to dealing with client data. He
added that regulation is necessary to a certain degree, but
regulation must address real problems. The cost of regulation for
companies has increased enormously in the past ten years and has
gone far beyond reasonable levels. This has hugely inflated
costs. “I do wonder if the benefits to the client have been as
big as the cost,” Count von Seilern-Aspang said.
Second panel
The following panel probed issues around data exchange and the
Common Reporting Standard. Speakers were David Walbank QC, of Red
Lion Chambers, Dr Christian Zamfir, co-founder of Cyberhaven, and
Tessa Lorimer, consultant at law firm Withers.
Lorimer – who used to work at the UK’s HM Revenue & Customs –
explained how new UK rules meant that authorities no longer had
to show “reasonable grounds” to suspect tax fraud in a foreign
location. CRS has been a “game changer” allowing authorities to
take a zero-tolerance approach. A raft of European Union and
other rules have tightened controls on suspected tax offenders.
One issue is that privileged information arising in tax cases can
end up in the in hands of third parties – a big concern, she
said.
Walbank, who has exprience of handling big tax cases, said that
CRS raises risks to people – given how information can end up in
certain hands – “considerably”. “I have become a little cynical
about the kind of blinkers worn by tax investigators,” he
said.
Third panel
A panel discussed regulatory developments in Switzerland, such as
various financial services legislation and their impact on single
family offices, small trust companies and private trust
companies. Speakers were Fabianne de Vos Burchart, attorney at
law in Geneva; Richard Grasby, member of the STEP Hong Kong
executive committee, and David Wilson, partner of Schellenberg
Wittmer.
There was discussion on the self-regulation by Swiss trustees. As
part of that procedure, each financial intermediary who operates
on a commercial basis, shall in the future need to register with
a supervisory organisation that is recognised by
FINMA. Panellists debated on to what extent, for example,
single family offices would be exempt from the new regulatory
net, and how “family” entities would or would not be exempt from
any rules.
“We still believe that private trust companies should benefit
from some kind of `family’ exemption but we also wanted to put
some limitation on it,” de Vos Burchart said.
Grasby, reflecting on the regulatory landscape, compared and
contrasted the current position in Switzerland with what happens
in Hong Kong, where five regulators exist.
The final panel of the first day considered how trustees think
about crypto-currencies such as Bitcoin. Speakers were Philipp
Buchel, founder, Blockchain Buro, Liechtenstein; Dr Luka
Muller-Studer, legal partner, MME Legal, and David Cooney,
partner, Charles Russell Speechlys.
There was concern over whether trustees would put volatile
crypto-currencies into a trust and whether the market needs to
significantly mature before that can happen. Definitions of
ownership of Bitcoin and other cryptos are still difficult,
delegates heard. An audience member asked about the KYC challenge
of knowing how a crypto-currency owner acquired the money to buy
the digital currency in the first place.
Next-gen
The following day panellists discussed inter-generational wealth
transfer, such as the need to engage young adults early on in
conversations about money. Speakers were HSH Princess Therese of
Liechtenstein, representing the second generation of ownership of
Industrie- und Finanzkontor Ets; Joshua Seth Rubenstein, partner,
Katten Muchin Rosenman; Dr Marina Walter, medical doctor,
University Center of Legal Medicine, Geneva, and Nicholas Jacob,
partner at Forsters.
Rubenstein enjoined the audience to remember when they were
children, and understand how strange and new financial affairs
could be. “It’s important to get the next gen up the learning
curve while you are still there before it’s too late,” he said.
“Leading by example is definitely key. You may have a lot of
wealth, but you may never know what might happen.” Jacob
noted that younger family members can be frustrated at being left
out of discussions.
Princess Therese agreed that parental example is vital: “We see
our parents always working.” She said she was introduced into the
family “constitution” in her early 20s when she was old enough to
grasp what it meant. “That’s an age when you begin to
understand the essence of responsibility.”
The second panel of the day examined matters concerning elderly
clients and cases of cognitive decline, such as Alzheimer’s
disease. Speakers were Edward Reed, partner at Macfarlanes; Craig
Swart, partner at Dickinson Gleeson, and Andrea Vicari, managing
partner at Vicari & Associati (Milan).
The panel drew out different approaches towards this issue in
Common Law and Civil Law jurisdictions. For example, some
countries such as Germany do not have a status of “legal
incapacity”. Recent years have seen a proliferation of tools to
deal with incapacity cases, such as “curatorship”, for example. A
general trend has been increased with respect for will-writers’
stated intentions before any incapacity takes hold. A number of
jurisdictions also now recognise trusts under Hague conventions,
as in the case with Italy, the conference heard. A challenge for
practitioners is dealing with cross-border cases where rules may
not be recognised in foreign locations.
A following panel addressed citizenship/residency-by-investment
programmes, also known sometimes as “golden visas”, and how these
vary. There are now scores of schemes around the world, such as
in Malta, Cyprus and Portugal. (Canada and the UK have suspended
their programmes.) Panellists were Maurizio Di Salvo, of counsel,
Anderson Tax Legal; Justine Markovitz, head of Swiss operations,
Withers, and Inbal Faibish Wassmer, partner at Rosenberg
Abramovich Schneller.
Markovitz addressed the UK’s frostier attitude to foreign-born
high net worth clients, noting how the UK has squeezed the
non-domiciled regime. Brexit has created a “hostile environment”
about immigration, although the government has sought to allay
fears with its settlement status system for EU citizens. Di Salvo
talked about Italy’s own version of a non-dom system, running
through its technical features, while Markovitz explained the
golden visa schemes of nations such as Cyprus and Malta. In
Malta, she noted that the Mediterranean island is requiring more
onerous tests of “substance” for people seeking to live
there.
Relations between Switzerland and the UK – given the fraught
Brexit issue – were aired in a following panel. Speakers were
Duncan Macintyre, chief executive UK for Lombard Odier; Jane
Owen, British Ambassador to Switzerland and Liechtenstein, and
Michael Mckay, founder of The McKay Interview. Owen stated that
Prime Minister Theresa May wanted the UK to leave Brexit with a
deal but was preparing for a possible departure without an
agreement. She pointed out how the UK has already reached a range
of bilateral treaties with Switzerland and Liechtenstein.
Macintyre said the financial industry wants certainty.
A following panel on international developments noted the use of
trusts in certain Gulf Co-operation Council jurisdictions, such
as Qatar and United Arab Emirates. Separately, in the US, the
Trump tax cuts of late 2017 had encouraged the greater use of
C-corporation status in tax treatment terms, because corporate
rates were below income tax rates in certain cases. Speakers were
Patrick Brunhart, deputy director, Liechtenstein Office for
International Financial Affairs; Joshua Seth Rubenstein, partner,
Katten Muchin Rosenman, Stephanie Jarrett, partner at Baker
McKenzie, and David Russell (as previously mentioned
above).
Sponsors for the event were Industrie- und Finanzkontor, Wealth
Preservation Experts – (Gold/Headline); Peritus Investment
Consultancy – (Silver); Stonehage Fleming (UK) Limited –
(Bronze).
Other sponsors: Swisspartners Marcuard Heritage AG – Bronze and drinks reception; Cadell + Co; Butterfield Trust (Switzerland); Schroder & Co Bank AG; Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd; LGT Private Banking; Accuro Trust (Switzerland) AG; Swiss Life Global Solutions; Dohle Corporate and Trust Services Limited; Alliance Trust; LANCE Platform; Microgen; ThatcherMackenzie; WealthBriefing was media sponsor for this conference; the conference was organised by The Beehive Partnership.