Compliance
Compliance Corner: Mishcon De Reya, Solicitors Regulation Authority

The latest compliance news: regulatory developments, punishments, guidance, permissions and new product and service offerings.
The Solicitors
Regulation Authority, which oversees lawyers in England and
Wales, has imposed a £232,500 ($315,732) penalty on Mishcon de Reya,
the London-based law firm, for failings over anti-money
laundering procedures.
Mishcon de Reya will also pay the £50,000 costs of a probe
into the matter, the SRA said in a statement on 20 December, and
reported more widely in the media late last week.
The regulator’s actions cover a period from September 2015 to
April 2017, when the law firm worked for two individual clients
(unnamed in the SRA statement), and unnamed corporate vehicles
connected with the same two individual clients. Mishcon de Reya’s
work related to a non-SRA regulatory investigation, asset
planning for one of the individuals, and the initial stages of
the proposed acquisition of two separate entities (and the onward
sale of one of them), the SRA said.
“While the firm believes that customer due diligence (CDD) was
obtained in relation to the two individual clients, the firm did
not retain the hard copy file of such documents, which appear to
have been misplaced, and no electronic copy of the records was
retained either,” the SRA said. The watchdog said that some
documents, but not a full set of them, were obtained about one of
the corporate vehicles involved in one of the proposed
acquisitions.
The SRA said that the proposed acquisitions presented a “higher
risk of money laundering or terrorist financing” under the
relevant money laundering legislation in force at the time,
because they involved companies in high-risk jurisdictions. Such
a position meant that “enhanced customer due diligence (EDD) and
ongoing monitoring [..] was not adequately applied.”
Mishcon de Reya did not profit from the episode and divested itself from the fees earned once the breaches were identified, the SRA said.
"The firm has amended its policies and procedures, including introducing and investing in new, more sophisticated IT systems which involve increasingly centralised record-keeping and are, in part, specifically designed to prevent future breaches of the type addressed by this agreement," the SRA said.
A spokesperson for the law firm told
WealthBriefing: "We are pleased to have come to a
settlement with the SRA relating to two separate and historic
investigations in relation to which we have made appropriate
admissions. Mitigating factors such as our cooperation with the
SRA throughout the investigations and the corrective action we
have taken since to prevent a recurrence have been recognised by
the SRA in reaching this outcome."
Among other details, the SRA said that one payment was made into
and three payments were made out of Mishcon de Reya’s client
account between 22 July and 28 July 2016, which “did not relate
to an underlying legal transaction in relation to which the firm
was instructed." Funds belonging to one corporate vehicle were
transferred to the client ledger for another corporate vehicle;
they were used to discharge the firm’s fees and disbursements on
the matter relating to the latter entity; and the firm did not
send a bill of costs, or other written notification of the costs
incurred, to the relevant entities before two invoices were
raised and paid out of monies held in [the] client account.
“Lawyers need to understand what they are being asked to do, by
whom, and why. If that doesn't stack up, press the alarm by
talking to a peer, the Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO)
and/or external advisors. The consequences of getting things
wrong are increasingly grim,” Alex Ktorides, head of risk
management and ethics, Ince, said in a note last Friday on the
matter.
“Some of the breaches, such as holding client money without doing
related legal work, are UK-centric rules set by the SRA. But at
their heart they are all essentially about having adequate
systems and controls in place to spot potential criminals, and to
know what to do if suspicions are reasonably aroused,” Ktorides
added.