Strategy
Comment: UBS Won't Divulge Names to US Authorities

Following the
Bradley Birkenfeld revelations and the reports that the US
authorities have requested Bern to provide information on US
citizens holding assets in Switzerland there have been a number
of reports suggesting improbable things such as that UBS may
divulge the names of up to 20,000 clients to the US. This is
plainly ridiculous.
Under Swiss Banking Secrecy laws, Switzerland may divulge
information in the event of tax fraud. Given the Qualified
Intermediary agreements in place between the US and
overseas banks and financial institutions this would mean in
cases where a client is demonstrated to have provided, for
example, a fraudulent statement on an IRS W8-BEN. This is the
form that investors in US securities need to complete to obtain
tax benefits if they are not US persons but is a form of self
declaration if they are.
Remember also that the QI agreements apply only to US citizens
holding US assets in overseas accounts. If these citizens hold
only euro assets then the agreement has no jurisdiction and there
is no reason for Bern to declare these clients to the US
authorities.
Speaking at a British Swiss Chamber of Commerce lunch in Geneva
on Friday Mrs Micheline Calmy-Ray, a Swiss Federal Councillor and
the head of the Federal Department of Foreign Affairs referred to
the Bradey Birkenfeld case. She stated that the US and
Switzerland are in close contact and have excellent relations. “A
solution to the request made for information will be found within
the frame of the current bilateral agreements,” she said.
So US citizens who have played to the strict rules of the QI
agreements should have nothing to fear from disclosure despite
any reports in the US to the contrary.