Asset Management
Actively-Managed Funds Feeling The Fee Compression Heat - Cerulli

The relentless pressure from "passive" funds is making an impact on those actively run portfolios.
The index-fund juggernaut has put asset management under pressure
because of its low fees and the Alpha-chasers in the actively
managed part of the industry are also feeling the heat.
Cerulli
Associates, the research and analytics firm, said that in
Europe, asset managers’ fees are coming down in a Darwinian
environment of battles over clients, the need for economies of
scale and an unfriendly regulatory climate.
The number of active funds with fees of less than the traditional
100 basis points is rising. The firm cited examples of large
active managers that have recently launched funds with lower fees
linked to performance, in what it said "could be the beginning of
a fightback for flows among active managers."
Big price cuts across index-tracking funds and exchange-traded
funds has benefited passive strategies, with industry behemoths
such as BlackRock
and Vanguard in the
US, or Lyxor in Europe,
faring well as a result. The trend is part of why a common
refrain has been that asset management will see more
consolidation, squeezing out mid-size firms and leaving only
boutiques at the specialist end.
But as the decade-long bull market in equities has given passive
investors an easy ascent, the case for the index-tracking
approach might hit trouble if markets flip over. And there may
not be much further room for passive funds’ fees to come down –
so the pressure is switching to fees on the active side,
according to Angelos Gousios, director of European retail
research at Cerulli, said.
Aside from the odd single basis point, passive fees cannot fall
much below the current lowest levels of around 5-6 bps, Cerulli
said. "Running and trading investment funds costs money; even a
cheap tracker fund has dealing costs," Gousios said in a
report.
The ability of a low headline fee to attract capital is becoming
increasingly muted. "Investors know that cheapest is not
necessarily best. Greater attention is being paid to how funds
are managed," he said.
The fee compression trend has been noticed for a while. In
response to investors moving money to index funds and low-cost
actively managed funds, more US equity funds cut their expense
ratios in 2017 than in 2016, a report by Morningstar in February
this year said. The fund tracker and analytics firm said it
examined the expense ratios for actively managed funds that
invest predominantly in domestic stocks.
Last year, BlackRock, the world’s largest listed fund manager,
shifted some of its teams from the actively managed fund space, a
move seen as a sign of how index funds have squeezed the sector.