Surveys
Switzerland Remains Richest Net Per Capita Nation; US In Second Place, Japan, Singapore In Top 10
Switzerland has felt a chill wind from pressures on offshore banking in recent years but it remains the richest country on a net per capita basis, while rival wealth management hubs of the UK and Singapore are in the top 10.
While sometimes there is talk that Switzerland’s standing as a
banking and wealth management hub is under threat, new figures
show the Alpine state ranked top for net per capita financial
assets last year, at €157,450 ($176,727), a 5.7 per cent
year-on-year rise, with the US in second place, at €138,710.
The rankings come from Allianz, the German financial services
conglomerate, in the sixth edition of its Global Wealth
Report. The report examines the asset and debt situation of
private households in more than 50 countries. It says that three
first-time milestones in financial asset development were passed
in 2014: the global net financial assets of private households
surpassed the €100-trillion mark, China’s private financial
assets exceeded those of Japan, and the number of people falling
into the wealth middle class in global terms breached the 1
billion mark.
Global gross financial assets of private households grew by 7.1
per cent in 2014, Allianz said.
The report, as it is based on figures for 2014 and measured in
euros, may see a number of updates for 2015, due for example to
the dramatic surge in the value of the Swiss franc at the start
of the year, as well as by the fact that stock market indices in
the developed world are down this year so far. (MSCI World Index
is down 2.72 per cent since the start of January.)
In terms of rankings, the UK came third for net per capita
assets, followed by Belgium, Sweden, Netherlands, Canada, Japan,
Singapore and Taiwan. In eleventh space was Denmark, then
New Zealand, Israel, Australia, France, Italy, Austria, Germany,
Ireland and Finland.
Globally, gross financial assets went up to a new record
level of €136 trillion – higher than the value of all of the
world's listed companies and all sovereign debt.
“Many observers will interpret these figures as evidence for the
so-called savings glut," Michael Heise, chief economist at
Allianz, said. “But this is the wrong perspective. Against the
backdrop of low interest rates, too many households are still not
saving enough for old age. Policymakers should not try to
restrict savings but find new ways and incentives to promote
capital demand,” he said.
Asia, Singapore
Singapore, Japan and Taiwan were three Asia jurisdictions to make
it into the top ten for net per capita income, a reminder that
for all the talk of Asia’s ascent and Europe’s relative woes,
there is still some way to go in terms of full catch-up. Beyond
the top 20, the picture is rather mixed for Asia. Whereas some
countries moved up – first and foremost China but also Singapore
– others slipped by four or more rungs, namely Indonesia,
Thailand and Malaysia, the report said.
In Singapore, gross financial assets grew by 6.4 per cent last
year, slightly more slowly than in previous years. The
strongest growth was reported in life and pension assets (9.0 per
cent), last but not least reflecting the need for private
provision, while securities in private households’ portfolios
increased by 1.2 per cent and bank deposits by 6.1 per
cent.
The need to save for old age is also reflected by the structure
of asset portfolios: almost half of all assets are held in life
and pensions assets; no other Asian country invests more in this
asset class. On the other hand, liability growth also slowed down
further to 5.4 per cent in 2014. The debt ratio (liabilities as a
percentage of GDP) continued to climb; at 75.5 per cent it
is clearly above the regional as well as the global average.
High growth in Asia has also left its mark on the world asset
map, where weightings continued to shift. The region Asia (ex
Japan) accounted in 2014 for a good 16 per cent of the world's
financial assets (gross as well as net). This figure is up by 1.4
percentage points on 2013 and means that the proportion of assets
held by this region has more than trebled since 2000.