Strategy
Risk, Compliance Professionals Want AI, Barriers Create Problems – Study
There seems to be little doubt that people working in sectors such as banking and finance want to use AI and value what it can offer, but there are hurdles they need to jump over, a study shows. The topic was very much at the forefront as policymakers from around the world gathered in the UK this week.
Risk and compliance decision-makers in firms around the world
want to adopt AI but they face poor internal data quality, lack
of clarity about regulations and a dearth of expertise, a survey
from Moody’s
Analytics has found.
In its study of more than 550 people in 67 countries, it
shows that the top three areas where AI is being applied are data
analysis and interpretation (63 per cent), risk management (53
per cent), and fraud detection (51 per cent).
The study came out shortly after US President Joe Biden issued an
executive order on how his administration intends to police AI.
(See reactions to that initiative here.)
In the UK yesterday, prominent figures from around the
world, including business tycoon Elon Musk, joined UK Prime
Minister Rishi Sunak and others to discuss how AI should be
regulated. Policymakers are trying to balance control of the tech
from potential “Frankenstein” scenarios against the benefits of
efficiency and productivity in a time of ageing populations. (See
a commentary on potential problems for firms using AI, here.)
In other findings, the Moody’s Analytics report said that 83 per
cent of all surveyed respondents expect that there will be
widespread adoption of AI in risk and compliance in the next one
to five years. However, the study found that only 14 per
cent of respondents said their own data was of high
quality.
“There is a clear data maturity gap, with 75 per cent who are not
contemplating the adoption of AI considering their data quality
to be poor,” the study said.
On regulation, 79 per cent of professionals think that new
legislation to regulate the use of AI in compliance is important,
while 66 per cent seek greater clarity on any existing AI-related
regulations in risk and compliance.
People/institutions are extremely cautious in this area. Only 28
per cent are positive about these models; 25 per cent
actively discourage or prohibit their use and 46 per cent haven’t
yet adopted a large language model (LLM) policy. Just 41 per cent
associate LLM terminology with risk and compliance.
Use case understanding: Only a quarter (26 per cent) rated their
overall understanding of AI’s relevance to risk management and
compliance as high. Compliance professionals are most likely to
identify improved efficiency in processes (72 per cent),
increased speed of data processing and analysis (72 per cent),
and cost savings due to automation or improved decision-making
(66 per cent). Fewer currently recognise the potential for more
advanced, transformative benefits, such as more
accurate results and predictions (51 per cent) and the
reduction of false positives (49 per cent).
Nine out of 10 early AI adopters report that AI is having a
positive impact on risk and compliance, the report said.
Almost 70 per cent of respondents think that AI will have a
transformative or major impact on their work.
“Compliance professionals are convinced that AI will be
transformative for their industry, but obstacles remain that
could hinder risk management and compliance functions from
capitalising on its potential,” Keith Berry, general manager,
Know Your Customer Solutions, Moody’s Analytics, said.
“With many of the professionals we spoke to expecting the
widespread adoption of AI in the next one to five years, steps
need to be taken for it to meet its transformative potential
across risk management and compliance,” Berry said. “For example,
when based on high quality data, AI is able to drastically reduce
the number of false positives in a KYC screening process at
scale, and can result in up to 80 per cent of level one
investigation and triage happening instantly and accurately.”
The survey participants were from a variety of sectors including
banking (40 per cent), other financial services (24 per cent),
and non-financial services (36 per cent).
The study was carried out between July and October
2023.
The topic of AI has become a staple of wealth management
conferences. This news service has written
on AI here.