Legal
New Twist For UBS, Credit Suisse In Georgian Billionaire Case – Report

The case – being heard in Singapore – which has embroiled Credit Suisse for years took a new turn this week. The bank is trying to overturn hundreds of millions of dollars in damages it owes to a Georgian billionaire.
  When UBS bought Credit Suisse last
  year, it knew it would inherit legal tangles that its smaller
  Swiss rival was involved in. One such case – in Singapore –
  relates to a Georgian billionaire, Bidzina Ivanishvili. A further
  twist in the case was heard earlier this week.
  
  According to an account of the case by Bloomberg (8
  April), a lawyer for a Credit Suisse trust seeking to overturn
  the $743 million in damages the bank owes to Ivanishvili said the
  staff responsible did their “incompetent best.”
  UBS declined to comment to WealthBriefingAsia about the
  case when asked yesterday.
  
  Credit Suisse is accused over mishandling rogue banker Patrice
  Lescaudron. The lead lawyer for Credit Suisse Trust Ltd
  reportedly told a court in Singapore this week that staff
  failed to inform their client of the illicit payments Lescaudron
  had made.
  
  “Put it simply, they were trying to do their incompetent best to
  address” the unauthorised payments, Lee Eng Beng is quoted as
  saying at the hearing at the Singapore Court of Appeal. They went
  to their superiors about Lescaudron but the one thing they didn’t
  do by 30 March 2008 was to let Ivanishvili know, he
  said.
  
  Lee and his team are seeking to have the award cut after a lower
  court ruled earlier that the bank’s trust had failed to safeguard
  Ivanishvili’s assets. It was revised down from an initial $926
  million.
  
  It is claimed that the trust failed to prevent Lescaudron
  from having any further access to the trust assets. Lescaudron
  was convicted in 2018 for running a fraudulent scheme in which he
  took money from Ivanishvili’s accounts to try and mask growing
  losses in other Russian clients’ portfolios. (See previous
  reports here and
  
  here.)