Strategy
GUEST ARTICLE: UBP On Which European Strategy Swiss Banks Should Adopt

A senior figure from the world of Swiss private banking considers the strategy banks in the country should adopt in a European context.
The demise of Swiss bank secrecy means financial institutions in the Alpine state have had to re-think their business models and figure out the true “value-add” they bring to the market. In this article, Michel Longhini, executive managing director, private banking at Union Bancaire Privée. This publication is pleased to share these views with readers and invites responses; the editors don’t necessarily share all views of guest contributors. Email tom.burroughes@wealthbriefing.com
Which European strategy should Swiss banks
adopt?
Although a break-up of the eurozone was regarded by some as
inevitable after last year's Brexit vote, that is no longer a
real threat. On the contrary, recent elections in the Netherlands
and particularly France – where Emmanuel Macron has from the
outset been in favour of a stronger, united Europe - seem to
have breathed new life into the European project. For the UK
- which has been plunged into uncertainty by last week's
parliamentary election - and by implication for Switzerland
as well, the opportunities for bilateral talks that could have
arisen from a break-up scenario will therefore no longer
arise.
Eventually, Europe's new impetus could lead to stronger European
governance and solidarity against the UK, but also Switzerland,
when talks take place on future political and trade
relationships. As a result, the prospect of banks established in
Switzerland gaining access to the European market seems to be
receding by the day, especially since discussions with Bern now
appear to be lower on Brussels' to-do list. Rather than
maintaining false hopes, Swiss banks are now taking a pragmatic
approach.
European operational hubs
Banks are implementing several business models depending on their
size and European strategy. The largest banks have opted to set
up European operational hubs. They are located in Germany or
Luxembourg and are intended to manage all the banks' European
subsidiaries outside Switzerland. The main aim of these hubs is
to take an "industrial" approach to optimising operations, and
have no direct connection with EU talks.
Other banks have less ambitious plans, setting up European
subsidiaries to develop branches that have strictly commercial
operations. The aim is to benefit from European passporting
through small units that have local competencies, with
centralised booking generally based in Luxembourg.
Lastly, banks that do not have critical mass are taking a more
conservative approach. Rather than developing European franchises
they are promoting their booking capabilities in Switzerland,
Monaco or London, offering clients a way of diversifying
geopolitical and currency risk when managing their assets.
Europe more difficult than Asia
Whatever the approach adopted, the issue that all Swiss banks
face is to remain competitive in a foreign market. For a bank to
achieve penetration in a market other than its domestic market,
it needs to develop financial products and services that suit
specific local features and tax environments, and must have a
firm grip on capital adequacy and tax reporting obligations.
Having a "local" bank is helpful in meeting those
requirements.
As a result, Europe has become a more hotly contested market,
where it is a real challenge for foreign banks to combine a
competitive product range with a competitive business mix that
delivers sustained, profitable growth. Because entry barriers are
higher today in Europe than they are in Asia.
European countries are also competing hard with each other to
offer attractive tax arrangements. For example, Portugal is
drawing in many new European and non-European residents with its
long-term tax exemptions. Italy has also announced a plan to
attract new tax residents. Following the Brexit vote, the UK has
clearly signalled that it will also introduce favourable tax
arrangements.
Clearly, banks need to be agile and clear-sighted when betting on
which country will be the next Eldorado for wealth management. It
is worth noting that the referendum vote against Switzerland's
Corporate Tax Reform Act III in February could adversely affect
Switzerland relative to countries seeking to attract residents
and companies with new tax breaks.
More homogeneous offerings
In the current situation, Swiss banks' attempts to increase
coverage in Europe are not certain to succeed. Despite cultural
similarities and historical links with European client bases,
Europe is no longer offering the growth prospects it used to. The
opportunity set has shifted to countries seeking stability and
diversification, such as those in the Middle East and more
broadly in emerging-market countries. In a new development, Swiss
banks' settlement of their disputes with the US Department of
Justice means that the US market once again holds a lot of
potential for them. Banks that have the right legal and
operational structures to handle US clients could have an
advantage over the long run.
Turning back to Europe, the product ranges of European and Swiss
banks are becoming more homogeneous and standardised. In the
coming year, this process will speed up as MiFID II comes into
force, requiring all European and Swiss banks to comply with
identical rules regarding transparency and compliance in the way
they manage client relationships. This is the main challenge
Swiss banks face in developing a European client base over the
long term.