Compliance
Compliance Corner: FCA Fine Capital Markets Firm Over "Serious Failings"
The latest compliance news: regulatory developments, punishments, guidance, permissions, new product and service offerings.
Financial Conduct Authority, ED&F Man Capital
Markets
The Financial
Conduct Authority has fined ED&F
Man Capital Markets £17.219 million ($21.3 million) for
“serious failings” in its oversight of cum-ex trading.
(A cum ex transaction involves three parties that move a share
position around just before the dividend payment date. After the
transaction, the shares end up with the same party whose position
remains the same. A dividend tax refund is claimed not once but
twice.)
These failings allowed MCM to collect fees for trading strategies
designed to enable its clients to illegitimately reclaim tax from
the Danish authorities, the FCA said in a statement on
Monday.
This is the fourth case brought by the FCA in relation to cum-ex
trading and the largest fine so far.
The regulator said that as MCM has not disputed the FCA’s
findings and agreed to settle, it qualified for a 30 per cent
discount under the FCA’s Settlement Discount Scheme. The fine
includes £5.06 million of income forfeited by MCM as a result of
their breaches in relation to cum-ex trading.
Between February 2012 and March 2015 MCM enabled significant
volumes of dividend arbitrage trading on behalf of clients,
allowing clients to make withholding tax reclaims.
It is established that £20 million of the WHT reclaims made by
MCM’s clients to the Danish tax authority were illegitimate. A
Dubai-based trading firm within the same corporate group as MCM
participated in the trading strategy which resulted in these
illegitimate WHT reclaims from SKAT. These reclaims were
illegitimate because under this strategy WHT was reclaimed
despite no shares being owned or borrowed, no dividend being
received, and no tax being paid. MCM generated £5.06 million in
fees from this, the UK regulator said.
MCM had inadequate compliance checks and failed to ensure that
this dividend arbitrage trading was legitimate, the FCA
said.
The firm’s compliance function did not have the necessary
expertise to monitor or review the trading and only carried out a
high-level annual compliance review of the department
responsible. It failed to take any steps to understand the
trading activities or properly consider the risks of dividend
arbitrage trading.
“MCM facilitated a significant volume of trades for the purpose
of making illegitimate tax reclaims from the Danish Exchequer and
earned themselves significant fees. It is completely unacceptable
for authorised firms to make money from this kind of trading.
It’s essential that all firms have the right controls and
expertise in place to avoid the risk of being used to facilitate
financial crime,” Therese Chambers, joint executive director of
enforcement and market oversight, said.
This action is part of a range of measures taken by the FCA in connection with cum-ex dividend arbitrage cases and WHT schemes, which has involved proactive engagement with global law enforcement authorities.