Compliance
APCIMS Wants More Detail From FSA on Capital Standards

The UK Association of Private Client Investment Managers and Stockbrokers has expressed concerns about the Financial Services Authority’s St...
The UK Association of Private Client Investment Managers and Stockbrokers has expressed concerns about the Financial Services Authority’s Strengthening Capital Standards consultation paper and believes the standards are designed for international banks, not UK based private client brokers and investment managers. APCIMS has questioned the appropriateness of the Basel II risk-based framework for UK-based private client brokers and investment managers, and believes the framework is more appropriate to internationally active banks. The Association has raised a number of concerns:
- Proportionate implementation - what does this mean for its members, many of whom are “smaller investment firms”?
- Categorisation – the difficulty in determining which Capital Requirements Directive requirements apply to investment firms, plus what impact will the Directive on Markets in Financial Instruments have on all this?
- Lack of incentive to adopt more sophisticated approaches to operational risk charges and associated risk management standards
- Differences in capital charges applying at a solo and consolidated level
- Consolidated supervision – which firms will qualify for a waiver? What is the impact on those not currently consolidating?
- Insufficient information on how credit risk and market risk capital charges will apply to investment firms, and the link to current liquidity adjustments
- The new Pillar 2 requirements (under Pillar 2, firms and supervisors have to take a view on whether a firm should hold additional capital against risks not covered in Pillar 1 {minimum capital requirements}) – how will they be imposed?