Print this article
Report Warns Against Use Of Technology "Quick Fixes" Among Wealth Managers
Eliane Chavagnon
1 October 2013
Wealth
management firms should use a single platform for product distribution and
client data management if they want to take advantage of increased demand among
clients for their services, according to a new white
paper.
Many industry players currently take an "on-the-go" approach by
introducing quick fixes to solve immediate issues such as more stringent
regulatory requirements - but this does not solve core problems, the
firm says. The report will add to debate on what is the most efficient way for
wealth management firms to handle issues such as upgrades and
replacements for older technology, particular when sensitive client data
is at stake - a key issue for compliance - not to mention the need to
contain the costs of technology. (As well as providing investment
services, SEI also provides technology solutions to the financial
industry.) The
paper, The Legacy of Legacy Systems, points to industry
research which it says predicts that demand for wealth management
services is set to rise 7 per cent a year. It also
argues that this data-driven industry might be “misjudging the rising
importance of clients’ desire to control their finances,” citing
findings from The Futurewealth Report by Scorpio Partnership. While the paper acknowledges that many advisors feel challenged by the idea of clients taking
control of their finances, it notes that newer platforms are likely to offer
scale and efficiencies - that older systems cannot achieve - and in turn generate
more sales. The
findings resonate with those of a recent Celent study - Driving Efficiency Through Wealth Management Platforms - which said
that firms are looking to gain efficiency by creating a “unified offering” with
a just few key strategic partners. In another study earlier this year, SimCorp claimed that as client and market demands
intensify, state-of-the-art investment management systems result in a lower
cost of operations over time versus retaining a legacy system. “Co-pilot” Alongside
the idea that a growing number of wealth management clients would like to be in
charge of their finances is the notion that they also want to interact with
professionals to help them with their more complex financial requirements. “This
client co-pilot can range from a single person to a family and their appointed
advisors. The wealth management co-pilot can be a single individual advisor or
a team that includes a relationship manager, accountant, lawyer and so on,” SEI
said. And while this type of evolution is “noteworthy” at smaller wealth management firms, bigger
players have more to gain, the firm added. “Larger
institutions are most aware of the obstacles to their growth, and they have the
scale, the brand and the economic buying power to make it possible. The threat
is that many hold to the belief that the best solutions are built internally.
They could be, but not in a timely, affordable and scalable manner,” it says. According to Al Chiaradonna, senior vice president, SEI Wealth
Platform, the wealth management industry can learn from other industries
when it comes to addressing legacy system constraints. The aviation sector in particular is a good example of this, SEI
said: “Following a surge in air travel, airlines increased efficiency
and revenue by moving away from siloed systems to a unified platform
concept. Similarly, the paper suggests that the wealth management
industry transition to a single platform for product distribution and
client data, allowing for the integration of disparate processes and
redistribution of capital to focus on client needs.” The white
paper was published by SEI Executive Connections and is the first in a
four-part series called SEI Insights: The
Future of Wealth Management. The other three parts will examine changes to
risk management, behavioral segmentation and advisor productivity.