Print this article
EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: Church House Puts Faith In Tight Risk Controls To Deliver The Goods
Tom Burroughes
20 August 2013
Your correspondent will be the first to admit that when an
invitation was extended to interview managers at a firm called , I could not quite place the business. But while it may not have the sort of brand recognition of a
Fidelity, BlackRock or Threadneedle, Church House is happily getting on with the job of
running money for institutions and individuals in a risk-controlled way that
merits plenty of attention. The business house oversees £500 million ($782
million) of assets under management. One of its portfolios, for example, called
the Deep Value fund, delivered total returns of a very respectable 23 per cent
last year – beating the FTSE All Share Total Return Index (17.9 per cent). Church
House runs personal portfolios and specialist mandates for clients such as
family offices and private banks, as well as pension schemes. Collective investment schemes include Managed
Growth, Equity Income, Corporate Bond, Absolute Return and, as previously
mentioned, Deep Value. Tracing
its roots back to the 19th Century to a firm of West Country
solicitors, with offices near a church – hence the name - Church
House Investment Management was set up in 1999. It was the
asset management arm of Church House
Trust, a boutique private bank that was sold to Sir Richard Branson in 2010
when the buccaneering tycoon founded his own “Virgin” private banking business. The
remaining asset management business was bought out by its management. It is now owned by directors, employees and the Cayzer family. This publication recently interviewed James Johnsen,
director, at Church House, and
Jeroen Bos, investment director, at their London
offices near Piccadilly; the firm’s main office is Yeovil, Somerset. The firm has had a London office since 2004, enabling the asset
manager to broaden its client reach beyond those who used to come via the old
law firm practice. “A
core focus
for us is risk management,” Johnsen said, explaining – and this is a point made
to this publication by other wealth firms – that risk means permanent loss of
capital, not volatility per se. “In
1999 we set up a disciplined risk profiling system which was quite new at the
time,” he said. On a scale of one to ten, where 1 is very cautious and in cash,
and 10 is highly speculative, most clients are bunched around the 2-7 risk
range, he said. In
investment terms, there is a “strong value bias” in how the asset manager
chooses investments, he said. This
leads point was picked up by Bos, who, as manager of the Deep Value fund,
focused in particular on its conservative approach in seeking assets that can
be bought at a discount. He has managed the Church House Deep Value fund since
December 2003 and his London
markets experience dates back to 1984. He’s lived through a fair number of
recessions and booms not to be beguiled by market gyrations, he said. The way
he runs this fund says a lot about the generally careful approach that the firm
takes towards investments, he said. In
choosing a potential investment, Bos said he will look at an undervalued stock and
look for catalysts for change; it avoids firms with debt. The firm has to have
been around for some time with a track record of some time. “We
are not momentum investors and don’t take country bets. We also don’t use
derivatives to enhance returns but do use them if necessary to protect capital,”
he continued. The
DVI fund has around 20 investments – a highly concentrated portfolio and
unlikely, according to Church House’s marketing literature, to exceed
30 holdings. Bos likes firms where net current assets are worth more than the
share price per share. The key figure to watch, he said, is the “net net working capital” figure, which is arrived
at by taking net current assets and subtracting the current liabilities and
long-term debt. (The fund has an annual management charge of 1.25 per cent of
assets; there is no performance haircut.) Speciality For
such a relatively modest business, a capability in fixed income is quite
unusual, Johnson said, and appeals to clients who want this service. The CH Investment
Grade Total Return fund has delivered a one-year performance of 7.2 per cent,
ahead of the ML AA Corp 7-10yr Total Return Index, at 3.7 per cent. The
firm covers equities, bonds and cash. It does not, however, invest directly in
property. If a client wants property exposure the firm will use a listed
vehicle. The same approach applies to areas such as private equity and hedge
funds. Clients attach high importance to transparency of their investments and
liquidity. Most
clients are based in the UK
although there are a few non-UK clients, Johnsen added. Church
House Investment Management might not be the biggest name on the street, but
consistent performance will win it a wider audience. This publication will
certainly keep an eye out for it in future.