Print this article
Guest Comment: Tax Neutrals Still Need Tax Treaties
Martin Crawford
OIL
16 July 2012
As
cross-border structures become more complex and multi-layered, an increasing
number of transactions will be routed through Hong Kong and Singapore in Asia
and Malta, Luxembourg and Cyprus in Europe. A tax neutral jurisdiction needs to
build relationships with these players in order to stay relevant, writes Martin Crawford chief executive officer of Offshore Incorporations Ltd (OIL). Guernsey
is on a roll. Like most offshore financial centers, the British crown
dependency has spent the last three years taking steps to comply with global
transparency requirements. Since November 2009, 11 double tax treaties have either been agreed or come into force as well as 29 tax information
exchange agreements. These actions have secured Guernsey’s place on the
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s “white list” of
jurisdictions, but a glance at the DTTs it has been working on since the start
of the year point to a second, more nuanced line of attack. In March
an agreement was reached with Malta. The following month Guernsey announced the
conclusion of treaty negotiations with Hong Kong and plans for talks with
Liechtenstein and Luxembourg. What we are seeing is the creation of a strategic
financial network. Guernsey recognises that signing DTTs with any jurisdiction
delivers limited long-term benefits; better to align oneself with a carefully
selected group of “mid-shore” locations
that are perceived as a bridge between the onshore and offshore worlds. As
cross-border structures become more complex and multi-layered, an increasing
number of transactions will be routed through Hong Kong and Singapore in Asia
and Malta, Luxembourg and Cyprus in Europe. A tax neutral jurisdiction needs to
build relationships with these players in order to stay relevant. Guernsey
is not the only offshore financial center to seize the initiative. Barbados and
Panama saw their DTTs with Luxembourg come into effect at the start of this
year as did an agreement between the United Arab Emirates and Cyprus. Jersey
and the Isle of Man have both signed treaties with Malta in recent years, while
Jersey and Seychelles are awaiting ratification of agreements with Luxembourg. The key
issue is that DTTs offer a lot more to tax neutral jurisdictions than TIEAs. The former
address information exchange but also offer a variety of other financial
benefits; the latter, by comparison, amount to little more than an agreement to
serve as an outpost for foreign revenue authorities. In this sense, a DTT with
a mid-shore financial center is particularly desirable because it solidifies a
trading relationship. For those managing offshore structures, just the tax
breaks on passive income – capital gains, interest, dividends, royalties, and
so on – are compelling. Qualification for treaty benefits rests on establishing
a sufficient level of substance in the jurisdiction so that regulators have no
reason to suspect a company exists solely to leverage these benefits. The
potential impact of this on a local economy is significant. Regulators look unfavorably on companies that, among
other things, have limited business activities in the jurisdiction or operate
on a scale that doesn’t tally with the amount of income being generated. It is
therefore necessary to set up a local office, hire staff and retain service
providers, lawyers and accountants to support the structure. For every company
that seeks to take advantage of treaty benefits, there is additional commercial
revenue for the jurisdiction. Tax neutral locations that rely heavily on the
financial services sector to spur GDP growth need this extra economic activity.
They also need to appreciate the role they are increasingly being called upon
to play in offshore structures. Guernsey, in seeking DTTs with Luxembourg and
Hong Kong, is trying to secure its future in Europe and Asia as a piece of the
fund management puzzle rather than its focal point. As an important private
equity fund jurisdiction, an alliance with Luxembourg offers access to the euro
zone and an easier time navigating the EU Alternative Investment Fund Manager
Directive. Hong Kong, meanwhile, is the destination of choice for fund managers
targeting a rapidly growing region. Put more broadly, a tax neutral jurisdiction can
co-exist effectively with a mid-shore location provided it lays the groundwork.
As an example, fund managers holding assets in India or China through
investment holding companies in BVI or Cayman Islands will eventually want to
realise their
gains and return proceeds to investors worldwide in a financially efficient
manner. If these structures include mid-shore jurisdictions, such as Hong Kong and
Singapore, then investors have greater certainty about how their investment
gains will be taxed. Without such agreements, fund managers will look for
certainty elsewhere which could result in certain jurisdictions being cut out
of the loop. More than three quarters of industry participants
surveyed as part of OIL’s
latest Offshore 2020 White Paper said they were seeing increased demand from
clients to incorporate onshore elements into offshore structures, largely
citing regulatory reasons. Eight in 10 respondents reported a growing call for
combination structures. In 5-10 years, Hong Kong and Singapore are expected to
supplant BVI and Cayman as the most important jurisdictions but it is not a
zero-sum game. While BVI and Cayman are so well established that their
influence is unlikely to fade, steps can be taken to consolidate their market
positions. Much the same applies to second tier tax neutral locations such as
Mauritius, Seychelles and Samoa. First, they must satisfy the global investment
community that they are able to meet transparency requirements. Second, they
should forge strategic alliances with mid-shore financial centers, initially
through DTTs. The nay-sayers who are skeptical that tax neutral
jurisdictions have anything to offer potential DTT partners should think again.
Some are already taking the lead. After all, a carefully assembled network of
tax treaties is crucial to the long-term sustainability of their financial
sectors.