Print this article

Guest Comment: Tax Neutrals Still Need Tax Treaties

Martin Crawford

OIL

16 July 2012

As cross-border structures become more complex and multi-layered, an increasing number of transactions will be routed through Hong Kong and Singapore in Asia and Malta, Luxembourg and Cyprus in Europe. A tax neutral jurisdiction needs to build relationships with these players in order to stay relevant, writes Martin Crawford chief executive officer of Offshore Incorporations Ltd (OIL).

Guernsey is on a roll. Like most offshore financial centers, the British crown dependency has spent the last three years taking steps to comply with global transparency requirements. Since November 2009, 11 double tax treaties have either been agreed or come into force as well as 29 tax information exchange agreements. These actions have secured Guernsey’s place on the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s “white list” of jurisdictions, but a glance at the DTTs it has been working on since the start of the year point to a second, more nuanced line of attack.

In March an agreement was reached with Malta. The following month Guernsey announced the conclusion of treaty negotiations with Hong Kong and plans for talks with Liechtenstein and Luxembourg. What we are seeing is the creation of a strategic financial network. Guernsey recognises that signing DTTs with any jurisdiction delivers limited long-term benefits; better to align oneself with a carefully selected group of “mid-shore” locations  that are perceived as a bridge between the onshore and offshore worlds.

As cross-border structures become more complex and multi-layered, an increasing number of transactions will be routed through Hong Kong and Singapore in Asia and Malta, Luxembourg and Cyprus in Europe. A tax neutral jurisdiction needs to build relationships with these players in order to stay relevant.

Guernsey is not the only offshore financial center to seize the initiative. Barbados and Panama saw their DTTs with Luxembourg come into effect at the start of this year as did an agreement between the United Arab Emirates and Cyprus. Jersey and the Isle of Man have both signed treaties with Malta in recent years, while Jersey and Seychelles are awaiting ratification of agreements with Luxembourg.

The key issue is that DTTs offer a lot more to tax neutral jurisdictions than TIEAs. The former address information exchange but also offer a variety of other financial benefits; the latter, by comparison, amount to little more than an agreement to serve as an outpost for foreign revenue authorities. In this sense, a DTT with a mid-shore financial center is particularly desirable because it solidifies a trading relationship. For those managing offshore structures, just the tax breaks on passive income – capital gains, interest, dividends, royalties, and so on – are compelling.

Qualification for treaty benefits rests on establishing a sufficient level of substance in the jurisdiction so that regulators have no reason to suspect a company exists solely to leverage these benefits. The potential impact of this on a local economy is significant.

Regulators look unfavorably on companies that, among other things, have limited business activities in the jurisdiction or operate on a scale that doesn’t tally with the amount of income being generated. It is therefore necessary to set up a local office, hire staff and retain service providers, lawyers and accountants to support the structure. For every company that seeks to take advantage of treaty benefits, there is additional commercial revenue for the jurisdiction.

Tax neutral locations that rely heavily on the financial services sector to spur GDP growth need this extra economic activity. They also need to appreciate the role they are increasingly being called upon to play in offshore structures. Guernsey, in seeking DTTs with Luxembourg and Hong Kong, is trying to secure its future in Europe and Asia as a piece of the fund management puzzle rather than its focal point. As an important private equity fund jurisdiction, an alliance with Luxembourg offers access to the euro zone and an easier time navigating the EU Alternative Investment Fund Manager Directive. Hong Kong, meanwhile, is the destination of choice for fund managers targeting a rapidly growing region.

Put more broadly, a tax neutral jurisdiction can co-exist effectively with a mid-shore location provided it lays the groundwork. As an example, fund managers holding assets in India or China through investment holding companies in BVI or Cayman Islands will eventually want to realise their gains and return proceeds to investors worldwide in a financially efficient manner. If these structures include mid-shore jurisdictions, such as Hong Kong and Singapore, then investors have greater certainty about how their investment gains will be taxed. Without such agreements, fund managers will look for certainty elsewhere which could result in certain jurisdictions being cut out of the loop.

More than three quarters of industry participants surveyed as part of OIL’s latest Offshore 2020 White Paper said they were seeing increased demand from clients to incorporate onshore elements into offshore structures, largely citing regulatory reasons. Eight in 10 respondents reported a growing call for combination structures.

In 5-10 years, Hong Kong and Singapore are expected to supplant BVI and Cayman as the most important jurisdictions but it is not a zero-sum game. While BVI and Cayman are so well established that their influence is unlikely to fade, steps can be taken to consolidate their market positions. Much the same applies to second tier tax neutral locations such as Mauritius, Seychelles and Samoa. First, they must satisfy the global investment community that they are able to meet transparency requirements. Second, they should forge strategic alliances with mid-shore financial centers, initially through DTTs.

The nay-sayers who are skeptical that tax neutral jurisdictions have anything to offer potential DTT partners should think again. Some are already taking the lead. After all, a carefully assembled network of tax treaties is crucial to the long-term sustainability of their financial sectors.