Mr Tindall was banned from providing financial services after ASIC found that he had:

• engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct on a client's behalf by failing to disclose that client's pre-existing medical conditions on an insurance application he submitted to an insurer;
• engaged in dishonest conduct by not disclosing the medical conditions in transferring that insurance that he had obtained to a new insurer; and
• recklessly made misleading comparisons about superannuation products to four clients, which induced those clients to make changes to their superannuation arrangements.

On 17 January, Tindall applied to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for a stay of the banning and review of ASIC's decision but was refused. The date for the hearing of review of ASIC's decision has yet to be set.