ESG
ESG Enters Client Suitability Menu Under MiFID II – How This Affects Advisors
There's a lack of clarity – so far – on whether UK advisors will be affected by the adjustment to MiFID II rules on suitability. Regardless, ESG ideas continue to permeate the wealth management value chain.
European Union rules guiding advisors on the kind of investment
services that suit clients must now include ESG ideas. But it is
unclear to what extent these changes affect UK-based advisors
after Brexit.
In August, a change to the Markets in Financial Instruments
Directive II (MiFID II) required investment advisors and
portfolio managers to incorporate clients’ sustainability (or
ESG) preferences into their suitability assessments.
The question is how much time and information is needed to make
this added requirement work. Without technology to ease the
process, it could add a fresh compliance burden on an
already-stretched industry.
The UK is now out of the EU – raising the question of whether
legislation derived from the EU still holds sway. This
publication understands, however, that changes to the European
Union’s version of MiFID II aren’t reflected in the UK version of
these rules, at least at the moment. As the UK tries to keep the
City competitive versus European financial hubs, it might not be
keen to layer further requirements onto financial advisors and
wealth managers.
The EU’s sustainability move is another example of how ESG is
injected into the wealth management value chain. With
controversies about skyrocketing energy costs and
“greenwashing,” it is easy to see why policymakers think the
topic should be on the investment menu.
“It is a huge challenge,” Agnès Lossi, a partner at Indefi, a strategy advisor for
the global investment industry, told this publication. Her firm
is based in Paris and New York.
Advisors are having to spend time and resources figuring out how
to integrate ESG ideas into the menus of what sort of investments
and financial services suit clients, she said.
The MiFID II changes will boost the need for high-quality,
easy-to-find data that advisors can put in front of clients, she
said. “The development will particularly boost the need for
specific products or tailored portfolios that will match ESG
preferences. This is broadly not the case today,” she added.
Asked if the new requirements make the advisory process even more
complex, Lossi agreed that it can do so and may, ironically,
increase risks in some cases. Even so, the direction of travel is
clearly set and ESG is a big trend in modern wealth
management.
“Many clients, such as the younger ones, want it [ESG
investing],” she said. “Everything is linked to
transparency…for me, this is the big issue.”
First outlined by the European Securities Market Authority (ESMA)
in 2021, the new rules apply to all forms of investment advice as
well as portfolio management.
Q3 has brought major changes to MiFID II and the client
suitability process. Indefi, a Paris-based leading strategy
advisor for the global investment management business, has been
having active discussions with asset management clients about how
to adapt to sustainability preferences. The firm sees a few
ways where this will change the competitive landscape for asset
managers and distributors.
Because advisors are now required to educate, provide
pre-contractual documentation, and assess client suitability,
additional preparation is needed before selling products to
clients. Asset managers who can get ahead of this work, and
create off-the-shelf products and processes, can save time for
distributors and offer them value. Some of the ways in which they
can achieve this are:
-- Providing marketing materials, documentation, and
suitability assessments to distributors;
-- The new jargon-filled paperwork will need to be presented to
clients in a digestible manner; and
-- Asset managers may try to align assessments with their
thinking to sell their products.
Increased fear of greenwashing will push distributors to rely on
asset managers to do the work of sorting through the intricacies
of sustainability for them.
To manage the individualised preference framework
effectively, asset managers will need to liaise with
distributors to service specific product needs.